This is a special educational post for "Cindy" regarding her/his/it's question what "fake" really means.The costumes that were mentioned in this main article are ALL FAKE! The 'art work' which was displayed as ORIGINALS are all FAKE, because the originals sold at auctions, years ago. The ones in England were copies. The people displaying these copies and fakes, and still charging money to the public--10 British Pounds per person--they should be going to prison for a while to think about their crime.FakeFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Learn more about using Wikipedia for research Jump to: navigation, search See also Fake (disambiguation)Look up fake in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.Fake means not real. For example, a document or other object created to look like a real object that exists or could exist, or a performance where an event is played, or untrue statements. Or a person who tries to be someone they're not by dressing and acting differently from their true selves.Applications include: * fun, art, use as a toy o for example, a film or play shows fake events, where actors show fake emotions, and where fake objects are used * an insult used to describe a person who lies, pretends to be something they are not, does not have an opinion of their own or pretends to like things he or she does not * deception o a forgery (a false document or picture) o a counterfeit (of an object) o a decoy * the same purpose (partly or fully) as the real thing o meat analogue o imitation fur o artificial leather o fake gun: can be used to threaten, e.g. in a robbery; for this reason fake guns are often prohibited, unless clearly distinguishable from a real gunReasons for using a fake object instead of the real thing include: * the real thing does not exist, including: o a document trying to prove something which is not true o a fantasy object * a fake version of an object may be: o more easily available o less expensive o less dangerous (e.g. a toy weapon, or a weapon prop) o less heavy o not requiring to kill an animal (meat analogue, imitation fur) o legal while the real thing is illegal o not requiring a license * decoys of a military target either require the extra effort to distinguish them from the real thing or make destruction less efficient by the need to destruct the decoys too; decoys are less expensive than the real thing; especially for missiles it is also important that they are less heavy; also they may be inflatable and therefore before deployment have a small volume; in the case of arms limitation agreements an advantage is also that they typically are not limited.Fake means LLama*hoax * replica * fiction * fantasy * virtual reality * dream * novel * film * hallucination * delusion * illusion * mimic * fake object - with "object" in the sense of object-oriented programming, used in computer software development and testingRetrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fake"Category: Reality
Cindy should really give me some little bonus, since she (or he) says: "I get so tired of everyone taking this lunatic's word as truth beforethey have truely looked at all the options. This exhibition is not directlytied to him therefore he must cry "fake" to get any recognition and benoticed."First up: it IS one of the following freaks who stalked me and tried to character assassinate me. I used recently the phrase "lunatic" against them and they always copied me on anything I said, did, created--bang: it was tried to be copied. So this gives it away. Second: they made fun of my spelling, knowing that English is only my second language--yet Cindy is maybe just a dumb brunette or balding and super obese Marilyn Monroe fan club 'President' who makes her living by talking new fans and members into buying her products and declares absurd MM books as "must haves." But: truely is really spelled: TRULY.Even I know that much...And: The Queen Mary Marilyn Monroe fraud that I successful debunked and ultimately shot down and stopped from touring the world for twelve years, that crime was also NOT DIRECTLY TIED to me! What do you mean by such a stupidity expression? Because the criminals tried to do this in England, far away and yet so close? Gotcha!Thanks to the Internet and WWW info--we are all almost one and pretty much neighbors.And Cindy--shouldn't you give me a few points just because of what you said? Because I am not a costume Queen like Greg Schreiner is, he should really have been the one who should have protested loud and clearly, but he was quiet and did not even peep. Could it be, that since he always sold these Travilla posters at the Marilyn Remembered Fan club meetings, that Greg Schreiner was closer to this entire hoax, than we all can imagine? He knew all the people involved, and since this crime was about to also tour the US, well....Here is Greg Schreiner in action, but strange that you did not hear anything from this costume addict. Are his costumes for real? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ85RTR5TRsNo, Cindy or whatever your real name is, nobody believes you that things are truly FAKE, unless you can prove it. I have always worked with proof and details and logic, only.But why am I telling you this, you know my life better, that is what you claim on all the other sites, the blogs where you follow me, harass and stalk me, better than myself!Some people would call that obsessive, or even crazy.Please stop your "cyber bullying," you CYBER BULL!
What I forgot, and since 'Cindy' claims there are some other so called 'experts,' let me ask her: who?Jill Ann Adams, 41, the failed actress, who never acted one singly hour professionally in her life (I am not talking about the still alive and famous Jill Adams), but the woman who would attack me on my first super successful blog exposure about the biggest fraud in exhibition history, who would follow me everywhere on the internet (Cindy might be just her!), and posted lies and together with two other criminal characters (a crazy obsessive stalker who threatened me with his AIDS infected blood: Eric Woodard, 45, and Heidi Hanson-Hidrobo, 40, who I caught in recent years when she was selling fake Marilyn Monroe belts on eBay, which she sprayed with Chanel No. 5 to make them "smell like Marilyn Monroe" as she claimed in her criminal descriptions for her frauds) tried to character assassinate me and my friends and supporters--why? Because they were literally hired by CMG Worldwide Mark Roesler and the Anna Strasberg defender who clearly were in super deep water and trouble.Or are you talking about the biggest coward in Monroe history: Greg Schreiner, 65, who claims to be anything--for the right amount of cash! He is keeping his mouth shut, despite the fact that the Hollywood Museum, where he is being paid and works also as 'curator' but fact is, that the museum is displaying many fake memorabilia items (not only Marilyn Monroe fakes), to the public! Another scam and fraud and that will also have to be exposed. I already pointed the owner of this terrible tourist trap to Hollywood officials: Donelle Dadigan, 75, is the true shame of Hollywood. She needs to be investigated ASAP, and she will be!Who else is there that these 'fans' claimed to be 'experts'?I challenged the world's most famous auction houses and pointed out the most obvious fakes and some have stopped the sale, some have not. You do not become an expert overnight. You have to work hard for it and you have to have succeeded.I did both.So WHO else is there, who would and can challenge me, and would have the balls to make a fool out of themselves, by going to the Police and reporting a fake Marilyn Monroe hair curler set.They were all laughing at first--but remember, always do:The one who is laughing last, is laughing best!Friends Through Marilyn!Mark Bellinghaushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14106389290483035531
Dear contactmusic.com and 'Cindy' aka as ANONYMOUS HATER!Brilliant. After the Queen Mary fraud I was attacked and now they were really quiet for a while. When 'Cindy,' who has her reason not to name her real name is complaining, it is obvious to anybody why.She is not talking about what has happened, and that she herself might be even part of this scam? Could it be? Ciny--I have worked hard for this super fast success within a week. I called every night for 6 hours authorities, fans and friends, newspapers, Hotel managers etc and when the Hilton kicked the criminals out, that was it. What have YOU done for Marilyn Monroe lately, except fantasizing about her death on your dreadful forums, which you fill up with product placement on top of your jealousy and nasty altitude.The sad thing is, and I have realized this lately especially is, that these so called 'fans' do not care about Marilyn Monroe at all. They established there own world and that world is only about their positions in terms of fan world. Sad and scary. They attack me for stopping a multi million British Pound fraud--the dresses were scheduled to tour the United States as well and then surly being sold at auction. But now they can be happy if they sell at a garage sell. When I found the clear and 100% proof, the key so to speak for my proof to stop this crime exhibit, that was the moment when they got kicked out of the Hilton, which was about to open and host their second attempt for a complete scam exhibit in Bath, England. Supported by a British MM lookalike who should be really ashamed of herself, for willingly to prank her fellow Brits. Suzie Kennedy knew that the dresses were fakes, and yet she would still go ahead and pose for them, travel with them. Thank you Jen, for speaking up and out. It is so much stronger when a beautiful woman as you is talking about Marilyn Monroe.
Cindy,What I am tired of is anonymous jealous "fans" like yourself who instead of taking your energies and applying them to really help the legacy of Marilyn Monroe, you go ahead and attack the one person, Mark Bellinghaus, who has done nothing but protect Marilyn Monroe. While all Americans were silent at the atrocity aboard the Queen Mary, Mark Bellinghaus took action and exposed this fraud. And the exhibit of lies sunk. Now he has uncovered a mega fraud in the UK, that the Hilton Hotel in the US so strongly agreed with his findings that they shut it down. If anyone needs to do more research, it is you, not this news agency or Mark Bellinghaus. Once again, he came through for Marilyn Monroe, while so many others failed her. And so many "fans" once again protected fraudulent activities.Jennifer J. DickinsonJournalist and Vice President of MARILYN MONROE PRODUCTIONS, LLC
There is more than one "expert" on Marilyn Monroe and what would be considered "fake". I get so tired of everyone taking this lunatic's word as truth before they have truely looked at all the options. This exhibition is not directly tied to him therefore he must cry "fake" to get any recognition and be noticed. He does not do this to protect Marilyn Monroe or he would ask that the matter be kept private so that her fans hear more possitive things instead of his constant slander and negativety.
I went to the first exhibition of this scam show, and after I saw those brand new 'movie costumes' I felt really angry for being duped.I understand that they are now on their way to Bath and that the Hilton over there is doing the same thing? Wouldn't this be a case for the Scotland Yarrd or some other official authority to step in and close down this crime?I really would like to have my money back.
13th October 2007 09:00
markbellinghaus
(4)
13th October 2007 08:00
markbellinghaus
(4)
13th October 2007 07:00
markbellinghaus
(4)
13th October 2007 07:00
markbellinghaus
(4)
13th October 2007 03:00
jenniferjdickinson
(1)
13th October 2007 00:00
cindy4marilyn
(1)
9th October 2007 20:00
Chuck Williams
(1)