10 August 2009 16:08

View all comments (4) - Comment on this story

BRIAN OXMAN - NO PATERNITY TEST FOR LESTER?

NEWS BY ARTIST ALPHABETICALLY

NO PATERNITY TEST FOR LESTER?

JACKSON family lawyer BRIAN OXMAN fears actor MARK LESTER will struggle to convince a judge to order a paternity test to prove he fathered MICHAEL JACKSON's daughter PARIS - because California law forbids it.
The Oliver! star is godfather to the King of Pop's three children Prince Michael, 12, Paris, 11, and seven-year-old Prince Michael II - and stunned the world this weekend (08-09Aug09) by announcing he could be Paris' biological dad.
Lester admits donating sperm to Jackson in 1996, while the singer was married to ex-wife Debbie Rowe, and has come forward with the shocking revelation about the youngster's parentage amid fears Jackson's mother Katherine plans to keep him away from the kids.
The Brit insists he just wants to remain a part of the children's lives - and is willing to fight for his right to access through the courts if the Jacksons continue to "exclude" him from contact.
But Oxman, a longtime representative for the Jackson clan, believes it will be difficult for Lester to secure a court-ordered paternity test, because Californian laws protect children from questioning their parentage if they are born to a married couple - and any paternity issues need to be addressed within two years of birth.
He tells British morning show GMTV, "If there were a request for a paternity test the judge would have to waive the law in the state of California, which says that a child born to a man and a woman who are married is conclusively presumed to be the child of that married couple - unless the paternity test is requested within two years of the birth of the child.
"So the result would be on the late side but it's up to a judge to make that decision. So in the Michael Jackson case I say, 'Anything is possible'. I think this is one of the most extraordinary cases I've seen."


10 August 2009 16:08


Tags: Brian Oxman - Mark Lester - Michael Jackson






BRIAN OXMAN News Letter

Subscribe to this news alert service to receive news and reviews on BRIAN OXMAN

Sign Up Now


View all comments (4) - Comment on this story


Comments

screen name:

KimInNY Click for more info ( 41)

posted on 10/08/2009 19:14


comments:

I can't believe he's a friend of Michael's. A friend would not pull something like this. I understnd he is the God Father of the kids But it is up to the family if you are a part of the kids lives. With you doing this it is just huting your chances of staying in the lives of Michael's children. I believe that it was Michael's sperm that created these children and anyway's if it happens not to have been it was a DONATION, a gift if you will. Michael was a great father to his children. He gave them a childhood that he didn't have. I hope the family keeps that childhood up the way Michael was raising them. They will continue to be happy children even though they lost their daddy. It will take some time but I know they will remember their daddy as the loving person he was.




screen name:

evarest Click for more info ( 47)

posted on 10/08/2009 17:58


comments:

Mark Lester, i think u are going too far, how could u betrayed the king of pop? if at all u donated ur sperm to michael, that dosent mean u should father his kids, if u realy needs to father those kid in the first case, u shouldnt have donated ur so called light sperm to michael, why cant u live those kids alone, for God sake, those kids are for michael and they are manufactured from michaels golden sperm. i know,Lester would like to sue jackson family to court. Lester u called michael ur friend and u are dragging his kid after his death, do u think michael will be happy with u he is still alve or can u say u are paris father is mchael was still alive?. there is a parrable in my country that goes like this-- if u offer present to ur dearest one, u dont needs to ask your dearest to pay back the present u offered him or her after 10years or less than. any one doing this, is a betrayer. Mark lester is a betrayer. am sorry to say this. Any one that think michael is death and choose to lie against him, that person will never succeed, despise michaels death, michael still have part of him livng on eath, l eva is one of michaels body living on earth and l will appreciated u Lester or what ever u are called, to stay clear from michaels kids.







©2009 Contactmusic.com Ltd, all rights reserved