View all comments (3) - Comment on this story
MEDIA SHOULD NOT CALL TERRORISTS "ISLAMIC," GROUP SAYS
NEWS BY ARTIST ALPHABETICALLY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEDIA SHOULD NOT CALL TERRORISTS "ISLAMIC," GROUP SAYS
In an apparent reference to recent reports about the terrorist attacks in Mumbai, the international Organization of the Islamic Conference, has charged that "some circles" had attempted to associate "such evil" with Islam, which, the group said, "condemns, scorns and outlaws" terrorist deeds. The attacks, the OIC said, were the acts of "deviant and fanatic individuals." It added that reporters "who refer to the perpetrators as acting on behalf of Islam help them by offering them justification, anchor and premise that they don't have or deserve." However, Robert Spencer, who oversees the website JihadWatch.org, which has been called an "Internet hate site" by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), told CNSNews.com, a unit of the conservative Media Research Center "[The OIC] is trying to hoodwink the U.N. and the West into passing speech codes that will forbid non-Muslim analysts from connecting any act of violence or terror to Islam, even when the perpetrators themselves make that connection. This will render the West mute and defenseless in the face of continuing Islamic jihadist aggression."
04/12/2008
View all comments (3) - Comment on this story
Hate site? LOL. Since when is exposing jihad terrorism "hate speech"? And as
the previous commenter has already mentioned, why in the world are your
assuming the veracity of the comments mande by a spokesman for the Council of
American Islamic Relations, who supports many of the groups that have killing
innocent people all around the world. Jihad Watch exposes Islamic terrorism
plain and simple. If exposing murder, subjugation, terrorism, the inequity
inherent in sharia law and the exhortations to kill infidels so that the West
is knowledgeable to the jihad threat is now classified as "hate speech", then
yes, I suppose Jihad Watch is guilty as charged of "hate speech."
I'm curious why your site reports that Robert Spencer's Jihad Watch site is a
"hate" site on the word of an organization (CAIR) who've had many of their top
people jailed or deported for associations with terrorist groups who kill
Americans. Jihad Watch is dedicated to exposing organizations just like CAIR
for what they really are, and your site has become a tool of CAIR's with the
article "Media should not call terrorists Islamic group".




