View all comments (2) - Comment on this story
SIR PAUL MCCARTNEY - MCCARTNEY HAILED FOR BOYCOTTING ANIMAL-TESTING CHARITIES
NEWS BY ARTIST ALPHABETICALLY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||

MCCARTNEY HAILED FOR BOYCOTTING ANIMAL-TESTING CHARITIES
LATEST: SIR PAUL MCCARTNEY has been praised by animal rights group PETA after announcing plans to boycott cancer charities who test on animals.
The multi-millionaire former Beatle has supported cancer charities since his first wife Linda died of the disease in 1998.
But on Monday (16Jul07) he revealed plans to refuse funding to organisations that practice vivisection, after discovering a number of charities close to his heart advocate the practice.
The vegan rocker said, "When Linda died I said I would support cancer charities. Animal rights groups wrote to me pointing out that many were heavily into vivisection - and it's true. A doctor we knew out in America just admitted it as a matter of fact, innocently, like 'Well, sure we do.'
"What he doesn't realise is that he won't get a donation out of me for that very fact. There are better alternatives but you're not allowed to challenge the status quo."
His decision has been applauded by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Alistair Currie - Senior Research and Campaigns Co-ordinator - says, “Animal testing charities don't just miss out on big money; they miss out on medical progress. Animals are not furry little humans and their bodies cannot reliably predict results for human conditions. While we know a great deal about cancer in mice, we don't know anywhere near enough about cancer in humans. Thankfully, there are plenty of charities that go for the triple win: they don't cause animal suffering; they do support modern non-animal research that increases the chance of finding cures for humans; and they get the money of smart, compassionate donors.”
18 July 2007 16:33
SIR PAUL MCCARTNEY News Letter
Subscribe to this news alert service to receive news and reviews on SIR PAUL MCCARTNEY
Sign Up Now
View all comments (2) - Comment on this story
Just because animal-testing is required by the federal government does not mean
that it is necessary to human health or that it is morally justified.
Many scientists insist that if we expended the same amount of time and money on
alternative research methods, we would get better results.
In fact, in a USDA press release January 12, 2006, Health & Human Services
Secretary Mike Leavitt said: "Currently, nine out of ten experimental drugs
fail in clinical studies because we cannot accurately predict how they will
behave in people based on laboratory and animal studies."
More importantly, you do not settle whether experimentation is justified by
merely showing that it is of some value to humans.
And this is bad for cancer charities how? Who would want to be affiliated with
McCartney, when he has embraced PETA's hate group after it has boasted to the
media that it had dispatched its members and supporters, dressed up as Devils,
to dance on the grave of someone they didn't like to traumatize the man's
family. Not many cancer charities I know of would want to affilate their
organizations with arrogant, ignorant celebrities who support hate groups like
PETA:
http://www.sun-herald.com/NewsArchive2/072102/tp5np15.htm


SIR PAUL MCCARTNEY Gallery



