View all comments (9) - Comment on this story
MICHAEL JACKSON - LESTER: 'JACKSON FOUND SEX DIFFICULT'
NEWS BY ARTIST ALPHABETICALLY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
More MICHAEL JACKSON Videos
LESTER: 'JACKSON FOUND SEX DIFFICULT'
MICHAEL JACKSON's longterm friend MARK LESTER has opened up about his decision to donate his sperm to the superstar - insisting the singer confided in him about his "difficult" sex life.
Lester claims he could be the biological father of Jackson's 11-year-old daughter Paris, after he agreed to give a sample to the late superstar in 1996.
The former child star has revealed Jackson, who married his kids' mother Debbie Rowe in 1996, spoke to him at length over the phone as they discussed his request.
Lester claims the singer wanted his pal to donate sperm, because he was "nervous" about sex and found it "difficult".
He tells U.S. TV show Today, "We had conversations on the telephone and Michael was very shy when it came to women and he confided in me that he found it very difficult to actually do the sexual act. He knew I had three, at the time, lovely girls (daughters), so I jokingly said, 'Michael if you don't want to do it, why don't I do it for you.'
"(I don't know) whether he just wanted to increase the chances of the artificial insemination, but he just said he was very, very nervous and said he wasn't up to going through with the act."
Lester also used the opportunity to hit back at his ex-wife, Jane, who recently accused the him of exaggerating his friendship with Jackson and insisting he couldn't have fathered Paris.
He adds, "My wife and I were having a lot of issues, although we were living together, we were living separate lives. Whatever I did - she would do the opposite, she was a difficult lady. She didn't like the Michael thing, she didn't like the idea of me being with Michael, the idea of us having fun together seemed to be alien to her. It was very sad. So this (sperm donation) was completely confidential. Nobody knew. I think it's probably because she wasn't informed and she felt left out of it in some way."
21 August 2009 16:11
Tags: Michael Jackson - Mark Lester
MICHAEL JACKSON News Letter
Subscribe to this news alert service to receive news and reviews on MICHAEL JACKSON
Sign Up Now
View all comments (9) - Comment on this story
screen name:
sissy2003 
(1)
posted on 21/08/2009 19:31
Well, now doesn't this make total sense. Rumor has it (Yes, I'm fed up with
the rumors too, but here goes) that Michael Jackson was taking female steroids
in attempt to suppress his voice from becoming "male".
That would also account for an inability to perform sexually. Along with that
disability, Michael couldn't trust people. Michael would have had to have
trusted the sex partner in order to perform.
I would have loved to have taught Michael Jackson how to make love. Could you
imagine teaching and making love to MICHAEL JACKSON. I'd even do it in
havinging a significant other. Yes, it would have taken maybe months or years
to gain his trust. However, if a sexual experience was what he truly wanted, I
would have given it all.
Many performers that I have spoken to say that performing live "is better than
sex". I would agree with that statement. I believe Michael Jackson's acts
contained sexual enuendos and he was perfectly happy being asexual. I LOVE
MICHAEL AND OMG, I WOULD HAVE MADE HIM ONE HAPPY MAN SEXUALLY.
screen name:
sissy1961 (1)
posted on 21/08/2009 19:12
Well, doesn't this make things a little clearer. Let's assume that Michael was
taking female hormones to supress the "male" voice change. That would atone
for Michael's inability (along with his shyness) to perform sexually. Hmmm,
interesting theory.
In order for one to perform sexually, there must be a mutual trust and in
Michael's case moreso. He needed to trust the other person and Michael trusted
noone.
Call me perverted or a fan. It doesn't matter, I'd have loved to have taught
Michael about sex, love making. Yes. it certainly would have been a long road,
but imagine making love with MICHAEL JACKSON. OMG!!!
In reality, Michael's "sexuality" played out on stage. Numerous artists
suggest that performing is "better than sex". Therefore, Michael didn't need
the physical sexuality. He already was fulfilled in making and performing his
music.
