View all comments (1) - Comment on this story
ART GARFUNKEL - GARFUNKEL IN DISABLED ROW
NEWS BY ARTIST ALPHABETICALLY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||

GARFUNKEL IN DISABLED ROW
ART GARFUNKEL has been criticised for allegedly insulting a handicapped fan at a concert.
The singer was reading a poem at a show in New York earlier this month (12Mar09) when he stopped midway through and reportedly berated a disabled person at the front of the audience.
According to an online blog, Garfunkel stopped reading his poem at least twice and then said: “I try to be kind to the handicapped, but I’m trying to put on a show here.”
A fan in a wheelchair was then apparently wheeled out.
And supporters of the singer have lambasted his behaviour, with one person writing online, “He is an arrogant (bleep). I am sorry I did not walk out of the concert.”
The manager of the Turning Stone Resort and Casino has confirmed an incident involving Garfunkel took place at the show.
No more details were available as WENN went to press.
21 March 2009 14:06
ART GARFUNKEL News Letter
Subscribe to this news alert service to receive news and reviews on ART GARFUNKEL
Sign Up Now
View all comments (1) - Comment on this story
As we all know there are always two sides to a story.
There appears to be an individual writing blogs with the intention of
slandering Art Garfunkel’s reputation due to his recent appearance at the
Turning Stone Resort in New York. As those of us who were there know, there
was an unknown constant and dissonant sound during Art’s poetry recital. It
was quite difficult to ascertain where or from whom these sounds were coming
from. It disrupted the show to the point Art stopped and waited for quiet so
the audience would be able to hear him. He did this more than once.
Eventually it was evident the behavior was from a developmentally disabled
person in the audience. After several attempts by Art to proceed with the show,
he stated "I'm as sympathetic as anyone for the handicapped, but I am trying to
do a show.” At this junction, the person accompanying the disabled person got
up to push the wheelchair bound person out of the theater. It was quite
obvious Art’s remarks were in no way insulting or berating to the disabled
person. On the contrary, we believe the remarks were geared toward the
insensitive person accompanying the disabled person who didn’t seem to notice
how disruptive this was for the audience or, if they did notice, didn’t care.
This incident has created a crusade by a zealot individual who believes her
interpretation of Art’s actions reflects Art’s opinion of all developmentally
disabled people. This blogger along with a few anonymous people appear to
believe they have the right to judge Art’s entire character and career due to
their observance of one incident without making any attempt to learn his
intent. We have known Art Garfunkel for ten years and can attest to the fact
that he is not at all an insensitive person to the challenges of
developmentally disabled people. One of his closest and dearest friends is one
of the chief architects of the Americans With Disabilities Act. This is an
issue of great significance to Art. He has performed at multiple benefits where
all proceeds are given to charities for the disabled.
It appears that we are witnessing here a rash and carp behavior by one
blogger. The irony of this blogger’s act is their blindness to their own
offensive behavior. They are attempting to malign Art’s reputation with
childish and insulting remarks for the sole intent of spreading their
uncultured comments to the media. And the media has coupled themselves with
this one-sided opinion of what transpired. A trait that has become too common
in today’s media and has lead to the witness of deterioration in professional
reporting.
In our opinion, fault lies with the behavior of the individual who accompanied
the disabled person. How could this person not know they were going to a
concert where the atmosphere would be more on the side of ‘easy listening’
music rather than ‘stadium rock’ music? Were they not aware of the involuntary
or untimely behavior many disabled people are challenged with?
We wonder if this blogger feels it is appropriate to allow unruly children to
disrupt worshippers at church services because they are children; or is it
appropriate to keep a crying baby in a theater because babies cry. Obviously it
is not. Why then is it wrong to ask to have any disruptive person step
outside. Are we carrying political correctness so far that the right of one
outweighs the rights of many because the person was disabled?

ART GARFUNKEL Gallery



