PAUL ANKA - ANKA PROMISED 50 PER CENT OF THIS IS IT ROYALTIES

Kim - I am glad you are so up-to-date on this subject and I hope that the administrators of MJ's estate notice your comment. Why shouldn't his estate receive retroactive royalties on Anka's previous release? It breaks my heart that he's gone and still THE GREED JUST DOESN'T STOP. I am ashamed to say I've enjoyed Paul Anka's music . . . I hope someone who knows him reads this because I just threw his records in the trash.

I wouldn't give him a dime of the procedes. He is already getting money from his version of the song that he did in 1991 that singer Safire sang. So Michael should have all the rights to his version that he did. You didn't see Michael sue Anka over the Anka's version of the song which he so deserves from Anka's version in 1991 so he should have let it be the way it was. He had to have known that Michael would use the song he did help create the song and had every right to use it seeings Anka used a version of it in 1991. It's not fair that he pulls this s**t after Michael is gone and can't fight about the fact that Anka already gets Royalties from his own version of the song. Why should he get double Royalties? If that is the case then where are Michael's Royalties from the version of the song that Anka released back in 1991? It is only fair that Michael gets Royalties from him on that song as well.