View all comments (2) - Comment on this story
ROLLING STONES - FORMER ROLLING STONES BOSS BOASTS OVER VERVE TRACK VICTORY
NEWS BY ARTIST ALPHABETICALLY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||

FORMER ROLLING STONES BOSS BOASTS OVER VERVE TRACK VICTORY
Former ROLLING STONES manager ANDREW LOOG OLDHAM has ridiculed THE VERVE frontman RICHARD ASHCROFT over his loss of rights to the band's biggest hit BITTER SWEET SYMPHONY.
Ashcroft used a sample from the Rolling Stones' 1965 hit The Last Time for the famous orchestral loop which kickstarts the Verve track. The section was recorded by Loog Oldham's side project, The Andrew Oldham Orchestra.
Although Ashcroft and his bandmates negotiated with Loog Oldham to use part of the riff, the band were later sued upon the single's release in 1997 for using "too much" of the agreed sample.
The two parties settled out of court, with Ashcroft agreeing to hand over songwriting copyright and all royalties garnered from the track to Loog Oldham, and Rolling Stone rockers Sir Mick Jagger and Keith Richards.
And now, more than 11 years since the suit was settled, Loog Oldham has derided the Verve singer - insisting he added no creative input into the song.
He tells Uncut magazine, "As for Richard Ashcroft, well, I don't know how an artist can be severely damaged by that experience.
"Songwriters have learned to call songs their children, and he thinks he wrote something. He didn't. I hope he's got (sic) over it. It takes a while."
And Loog Oldham jokingly boasts of what the track's royalties have brought him and his former charges, adding, "They (Jagger and Richards) have the watch and I have a pretty presentable watch strap. That's my little piece."
08 October 2008 16:07
Also see: Rolling Stones - The Verve - Richard Ashcroft
ROLLING STONES News Letter
Subscribe to this news alert service to receive news and reviews on ROLLING STONES
Sign Up Now
View all comments (2) - Comment on this story
It is ridiculous..
THE COPYRIGHT LAW ALLOWS USE WITH PERSMISSION , RICHARD and the boys were duped
and scammed . I would appeal it if I was you guys.
I would want to make sure that the bars used were even the bars in the
ROllingstone song as you know that needs to be established by the listeners and
not just by the judge. If it was then : as permit was given anyway it is only
the % share of the Smash HIt Bitter sweet symphony that they are to get.:
ROYALTY PAYMENT and not the whole thing..
Thirdly I would recover all of my monies from ALLEN then from Nike for illegal
sale and purchasing of something that was stolen that was not theirs as the
VERVES SONG is a protectible work in itself[ a sperate piece of work in itself]
and not the property of ALLEN AND CO.
Elizabeth F Obisanya
CASHBACK paper or plastic
CASHBACK v OH HAPPY DAY court victory.
I can understand why the Stones went after the royalties of the Verve's song
"Bittersweet Symphony" 10 years later... They need the money. Give me a break.
Or give the artist a break for turning a average song into a masterpiece. I
guess you can say it's their best hit in 10 years! Literally!!!


ROLLING STONES Gallery



