JAMES CAMERON - CAMERON DOCUMENTARY UNDER ATTACK

Mr Cameron is said to present scientific evidence of the existence of Christ´s family grave. Said tomb would thus have remained untouched by the same Je- wish priests that had the roman military to guard the body of Christ in order to prove that no resurrection could take place. It furthermore seems a bit odd that the Jesus clan had to place the body of Christ in the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea if a family tomb already existed. The oussaries are claimed to have held the remains of Jesus himself,his mother Maria, Mary of Magdala, Joseph, Christ´s brother, and a son Judas, fruit of an alledged marriage between Christ and Maria Magdalena. The scientific DNA tests to prove the arrangement have failed to comment on the fact that each oussary contained some three or four individuals and some other 35 diseased individuals found in the tomb. It is furthermore not made clear if the name Jesus appears at all, since old Hebrew scripture is known to be diffuclt to interpret. The fact that the alledged Mary of Magdala appears by her greek name Maria Neme o Mara is furthermore confusing. Accor-ding to historic sources her greek name can be traced to 187.A.D. and never mentioned by the Je- wish and Roman historians of the era. It furthermore seems astonishing that the disciples choosed to die for a hoax, accepting their profeth´s prosperous family life, while they restricted them- selves to live in celebacy. The Nazarene family of Jospeh and Mary is quite unlikely to choose a tomb in Judea but rather a site in the Nazareth aera of Galilea, due to patri- local habitual customs. The position of Joseph, the earthly pater of Jesus, as the head of the family clan seems unlikely to have been challenged and rleft to rest alone in Galilea. Mary of Magdala, by tradition said to be buried in S:t Maximine Sainte-Baume in south of France or reunited with Mary, mother of Christ, in Ephesus and transferred to Constantinople after her dead sudden-ly appears, according to Mr Cameron, in a middle - class tomb in Jersualem, after an astonishing transport of her relics and ,furthermore, now elevated to the position as the spouse of Jesus of Nazareth who evidently survived the crucifixtion in order to buy himself a family tomb. If not, would the apostles have taken the risk of buying a tomb accessible to the Jewish priesthood and the roman occupants, thus taking the risk of having their hoax exposed publicly? Mr Cameron may have problems with his career but he certaintly is ambitious enough to pull a stunt like this. But will he get way with it? He will, most ceratinly, benefit fiancially. May we rely on his greed to make him continue to expose the tomb of the prophet Mohamed soon? Douglas Modig Sweden