Michael Jackson - Jackson's Ex: 'Michael Is Not The Natural Father'

28 November 2005 17:14

Michael Jackson earned for anothert half-million copies of "Thriller" sold on display at the Michael Jackson family auction at the Hard Rock Casino & Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada

Caption: May 30, 2007 - Las Vegas, Nevada -The second award Michael Jackson (Picture) earned for anothert half....

Jackson's Ex: 'Michael Is Not The Natural Father'

MICHAEL JACKSON's ex-wife DEBBIE ROWE has told an Irish newspaper the THRILLER singer is not the biological father of their children PRINCE MICHAEL JR and PARIS.

Rowe, who was married to Jackson for three years between 1996 and 1999, claims her eight-year-old son and seven-year-old daughter were both conceived using anonymous semen brought from a sperm bank.

She tells the Sunday World, "Michael knows the truth - that he is not the natural father of Prince Michael Jr and Paris. He has to come clean.

"I have no information whatsoever about the identity of the semen donor for either child as such (semen) was obtained anonymously from a semen bank under an agreement of confidentiality."

More From The Web

Comment on this article

Tags: MICHAEL JACKSON

Comments View All Comments (18)

1st June 2006 07:00 faggotjackson (224)

	Of course wacko isn't the father of those children, Macaulay Culkin is. Michael Jackson would rather climb on a shaved monkey butt, or puff on a little boy instead of a woman. Not that Debbie Rowe is a woman anyway. She's just a rent-a-pig looking to get some money. Lisa Marie Presley dumped him when he couldn't get it up for her. Only a sick man couldn't get a stiffy for her. Of course, we're talking about Michael Jackson, he is indeed a sick "wo-man". Any guy who would pack tampons up his butt is a sicko. That would be MJ. news://alt.music.michael-jackson http://groups.google.com/group/alt.music.michael-jackson?hl=en http://www.childrenhatemj.net http://www.fluttergirl.com/michaeljackson/ http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=419375&poll_id=0&warned=y

30th November 2005 17:52 uberbilly (1)

	Considering the weirdo that he is...waht mother would 1) have children with him, 2) let them stay there, and 3) Allow him even supervised visites. Hell, What kind of dad wears make up while not on TV, is frequently charged with child molestation, and then dangles his kids out the window. Whatever talent he had doesn't justify what a train wreck of a human being he is. think about a few things...John Wayne Gacey was an artist, Mussilini(sp) was a great singer), and Ted Bundy was a poet. So being able to sing and dance like a jester has little bearing on someone's worth as a human being. next thing you know...people will suggest that having hit movies give them the moral authority to attempt to influence national and world policy.

30th November 2005 09:14 jeanette (2)

	Well, as long Michael or his spokesperson hasn´t said anything about it then I think it´s just a load of crap. Who cares anyway. The press are so fond of priting stories that are not true. When it comes to printing about Michael Jackson it´s always always blown out of porpotions. Just becuase you read it in the magazine or see it on the tv screen don´t make it factaul.