View all comments (1) - Comment on this review

Newton Faulkner - I Need Something Single Review


Newton Faulkner - I Need Something - Single Review
Newton Faulkner picture 5384263 Newton Faulkner picture 2028131

Newton Faulkner
I Need Something
Single Review


Russian political dissident Alexandr Litvinenko was assassinated by unwittingly ingesting Polonium-210, a dangerous radioactive isotope that has the nasty habit of being able to kill people very very easily. As any physicist will tell you, the denser an element is, the more likely it is to be, y'know, a bit nasty. Litvinenko's silent killer, one of the heaviest elements known to man, is so dangerous that just a gram of the stuff could in theory wipe out 50 million people. Ouch. The poor bloke didn't stand a chance.

But anyway, Newton Faulkner. According to the press blurb surrounding this chap, he plays "guitar like we've never heard it played before", which is quite a statement to make. Unfortunately it's more likely to be an accurate reflection of the listening habits of his target audience rather than the heavens heralding any new blessed innovator. For young Mr Faulkner is primed and ready for the mainstream let's tick off the signs: gravelly faux-soulful vocal stripped of all and every trace of personality - check; major label bankrolling this single - yup (Sony BMG); a lyric that, despite using actual words in grammatically accurate sentences, still manages to say absolutely nothing ("I need something to believe in because I don't believe in myself... and I don't mind anymore") - spot on. Which, in a world where Tom Chaplin is considered a drug fiend by the masses, means that a little bit of acoustic guitar tapping here and the odd harmonic there bookending the song is likely to send them into sweaty palpitations.

For those of you with a little more savvy however, here's the deal: Newton Faulkner has recently taken on support slots with Paolo Nutini and James Morrison, which may give you a pretty good idea of what the song sounds like before you've heard it. I'm sorry to say it's even worse than you'd think. This thing is incomprehensibly bad as a single, leaving no memorable melodic or lyrical trace once it's over; the kind of song that you're hard pushed to explain what it's like even while you're listening to it, even though you're aware that something is attacking you from within.

Which brings us back to our old friend Polonium-210. You see, I Need Something clocks in at less than three minutes, which means that per second it's surely one of the most densely damaging songs on the planet. So let this be a warning to you - exposure to even half a bar of this stuff will in all probability cause your hair to fall out, turn your internal organs to mush and you will spend the remainder of your mercifully few days in unbearable agony hallucinating and haemorrhaging from every conceivable orifice. Which is, I would like to think, the state that Sony BMG's A&R folk must have been in when they signed this chump.

This isn't music. It's 6-string radiation poisoning. It's too late for me now. Save yourselves.

Owen Lloyd

click here - Write for us - get your reviews published on Contactmusic


Click Here for all you need to know about: Newton Faulkner







View all comments (1) - Comment on this review

Comments
screen name:
psypaul Click for more info (1)
posted on 23/09/2009 12:21

comments:
Dear Mr. Reviewer,

It's interesting how you feel that someone that leaves no memorable melodic or
lyrical trace could also feel like it's killing you inside out. "It's too late
for me," too late to remember the song? It seems that you just have a strong
dislike of and grudge against the entire genre - In which case you are being
unfair on the individual song.


I'd like to say that 'because he's in the mainstream he must be good' - but I
am not so naive to say such a thing, as I've heard much of what is regularly on
the radio.


I need something is not a song that is supposed to have a large meaning,
(listen to 'people should smile more' - "I can't change the world") it is clear
that it is merely a song to express Faulkners own emotions. You cannot tell me
that there are no good songs that are just songs. Music can be for enjoyment
too, not a huge life-changing message.


Thankfully Faulkner seems the kind of person who doesn't take what petty little
people say to heart. (If you'll excuse my ad hominem attack there)


Well done on the science lesson.






©2009 Contactmusic.com Ltd, all rights reserved