Weapon of Mass Destruction: The Murderous Reign of Saddam Hussein Movie Review
Weapon of Mass Destruction: The Murderous Reign of Saddam Hussein Review
"Weapon of Mass Destruction: The Murderous Reign of Saddam Hussein" Overview

Rating: PG-13
2004
Cast and Crew
Director : Brad MaaskeProducer : Brad Maaske,Earl Grizzell
Screenwiter : Brad Maaske,Earl Grizzell,Ben Heald
Starring : Brad Maaske,Saddam Hussein
No matter how you feel about Michael Moore, you can't deny his influence. And
Central California real estate broker Brad Maaske, in his filmmaking debut,
isn't afraid to admit that Moore inspired him to get into an editing room and
"find out the truth" about Saddam Hussein and the U.S. war in Iraq.
The resulting production is infuriating, partly by design, partly by missteps.
Weapon of Mass Destruction: The Murderous Reign of Saddam Hussein makes a
powerful case against the world's negligence in failing to confront a tyrant
who committed genocide in his own country. But the second half of WMD is a
confused mess, delving into 9/11 and the reasons behind America's decision to
take Hussein out.
Maaske admits his 96-minute documentary is a response to Moore's Fahrenheit
9/11, but even from the other end of the political spectrum, this op-ed-style
movie bears Moore's greasy fingerprints. Maaske borrows liberally from the
Moore formula, jumping from historical reels, to on-location footage, to
"expert" interviews, to news media archives, to melodramatic events, to
man-on-the-street perspectives designed to make those with opposing viewpoints
look ignorant, all in service to an uneven polemic.
Following a cursory history of Saddam's thuggish rise to power, the heart of
WMD importantly chronicles his brutal tyranny over the Iraqi people, especially
the well-documented genocide against the Kurds. While missing on some major
points (like characterizing both Shiites and Sunnis as "Arabs" united against
the Kurds), the staggering footage of mass graves and the testimony of
survivors of torture, massacres, and chemical weapon attacks exemplify the
Baathist disregard for innocent life. The interviewed Iraqis are all highly
credible, and their pain is devastating.
But it's after returning to the homeland that the movie falters. The point of
the movie isn't just to give Saddam his due, but to rationalize the American
(and to a far lesser extent English, Australian, Italian, and let's-not-forget
Polish) effort to remove him with force.
To do this, WMD transforms rather suddenly into a softer version of Fox "News."
You'll be forgiven for a feeling of whiplash when 45 minutes of survivor
footage transitions to a 15-minute retrospective on the attacks of 9/11, a "day
that would forever change how America views her enemies." In his narration,
Maaske frequently parrots phrases from the 2004 Republican National Convention,
such as calling 9/11 an "unprecedented terrorist attack against America's
freedom" (a simplistic characterization that's ignorant of Osama bin Laden's
and Al Qaeda's motives and demands).
Before you know it, Maaske is praising the "Bush Doctrine" by jumbling up the
9/11 hijackers, the Taliban, Osama, Saddam, and even the post-war Iraqi
insurgents who beheaded Nick Berg. Unless you're the type of person who has a
hard time distinguishing Muslims, Arabs, and terrorists, you won't find this
terribly convincing, particularly because it's so far removed from the details
of Saddam's atrocities against Iraqis. (Once again, speeches from the 2004
Republican National Convention are featured as source material.)
The American personalities in WMD consist principally of conservative internet
muckraker Evan Coyle Maloney, a scholar from the right-leaning Hoover
Institute, and a professor from Biola University. (I hadn't heard of Biola
either until I went to its website and read that it's "a theologically
conservative, Protestant university that provides biblically centered
education.") Maloney's presence is especially grating, since it primarily
features useless, Moore-esque stunts, such as quizzing the craziest anti-war
protestors he could find (including San Francisco schizophrenic Frank "12
Galaxies" Chu) and making them look like chumps.
Maaske himself, after introducing himself early in the movie, mostly stays out
of the way, a fortunate decision since his narration is reminiscent of carpet
store ads on local cable. But in spite of WMD devolving into a jingoistic mess
in the second half, you gotta hand it to Maaske: He hocked everything he owned
to make something he really cared about. And isn't that the real American dream?
Aka WMD: Weapon of Mass Destruction.
Reviewer: Eric Meyerson



