Waterworld Movie Review
Waterworld Review
"Waterworld" Overview

Rating: R
1995
Cast and Crew
Director : Kevin ReynoldsProducer : Kevin Costner,John Davis,Charles Gordon
Screenwiter : Peter Rader,David N. Twohy,Joss Whedon
Starring : Kevin Costner,Dennis Hopper,Jeanne Tripplehorn
In the future, the polar ice caps have melted, the world is covered by water,
and everyone is left to fend for themselves as scavengers in a grim reality.
This is Waterworld, and you'll be glad to know: even in this harsh realm, the
women still shave their legs.
The most expensive movie ever made (the final word is $172 million), Waterworld
will be a true monument in Kevin Costner's career. Unfortunately, this film
isn't going to have quite the effect something like Dances with Wolves had.
The bottom line is Waterworld is a marginal film: always extravagant,
sometimes entertaining, often preachy and dull--a pure formula picture.
The story is time-tested and painfully simple. Costner plays The Mariner, a
lone drifter on the watery surface of the earth who talks about his boat more
than Forrest Gump. Jeanne Tripplehorn (The Firm) plays Helen, the love
interest and the protector of Enola (Tina Majorino), a child with a strange
tattoo which just may show the way to the mythical paradise of Dryland. The
obligatory bad guy is The Deacon (Dennis Hopper), a slave driver/preacher with
heavy artillery that acts a lot like, well, Dennis Hopper. I won't be the only
one to say, "It's Mad Max on water."
Of course, The Deacon wants the kid. The Mariner wants to protect her and
falls in love with Helen. So for 134 minutes, The Deacon chases the trio,
turning up over and over and over, always out of nowhere (ever try to hide on
the ocean?), and always being thwarted by The Mariner. Basically, it's Costner
trying to be a superhero, swinging around on a lot of ropes and blowing up
everything else.
This gets pretty old after awhile, especially since Costner looks more
concerned with what's for dinner than what's on the screen. The other problems
are innumerable: it's hard to figure out where the story is headed, the bad
guys act like members of a bumbling Keystone Coast Guard, and a number of
effects are obvious digital fakes. There are a few bright spots, but it ends
up being a passable story with lackluster execution.
All the hype surrounding this film has really spoiled what there was to enjoy.
If you see it, you'll probably be trying to figure out where all that money
went, too (I only counted about $100 million). It's too bad; you'll need that
brainpower just to figure out what's going on.
Reviewer: Christopher Null





