view all comments (2) - add your comments
Underworld Movie Review
Underworld Review

"Underworld" Overview

Rating: R
2003
Cast and Crew
Director : Len WisemanProducer : Gary Lucchesi,Tom Rosenberg,Richard S. Wright
Screenwiter : Danny McBride,Len Wiseman
Starring : Kate Beckinsale,Scott Speedman,Shane Brolly,Michael Sheen,Bill Nighy
Underworld’s trailer makes it looks wonderfully slick and dark in the tradition
of The Matrix and Blade; but after seeing it, you’ll realize that everything
that seemed dazzling was simply stolen and then abused – from its Dark
Shadows-meets-Matrix costumes to its Blade weaponry to its Nine Inch Nails
video backdrops. Nothing about Underworld is original; it’s a hackneyed,
patched-together goth-kid fantasy that I’m convinced was written a 15-year-old
boy who wears black eyeliner (think the Saturday Night Live skit “Goth Talk”).
Straight out of Marilyn Manson’s wet dreams comes the fantastical storyline:
For centuries, vampires have battled werewolves, known here as Lycans. It’s not
really clear why they’ve been battling, even after the film sort of reveals the
reason; so we’ll leave it there. The Vampires are depicted as aristocratic
sophisticates who prefer fine crystal and Porsches, whereas the Lycans are
filthy street thugs who morph into ferocious dog-like monsters.
Kate Beckinsale plays the beautiful and fierce vampire warrior Selene who, in
hunting the Lycans, discovers that a few of them are tracking a human named
Michael (Scott Speedman). In her effort to unravel what role Michael plays in
the Lycans’ war plans, she finds out that Michael is a werewolf. Then, somehow,
they fall in love, and they begin to seek out an end to the ancient feud
together.
Sound to you like Romeo and Juliet with monsters? You’d be right, if the movie
weren’t so short on character development. Instead of chemistry, you’re
wondering why they’re even kissing in the first place. Sadly, most of the
actors in the film appear to be trying their darnedest just to act. Shane
Brolly, who plays the interim head of vampires named Kraven, seems to think
wincing, smirking, and gritting teeth constitutes intensity. It’s outright
laughable.
Unfortunately, it’s hard to distinguish between what’s bad acting and what’s
just extremely bad writing. The dialogue is as a mish mash of Interview with a
Vampire and Commando, and the bits of real world chatter you get between action
sequences are as lame as what you’d hear in a porn film. Adding to my theory
that a goth high-schooler penned this atrocity, the writers throw in gimmicks
that they probably thought were really cool, like ultraviolet bullets that glow
blue. Ultraviolet bullets? How does that work? How do you get sunlight or
ultraviolet radiation inside a glass bullet? It’s just pure nonsense.
So, you’re thinking, it’s at least stylish, right? Yes, to a degree; but the
art direction is so clichéd that it can’t really boost this bust. Even the
fight scenes fall flat; instead of the graceful, awe-inspiring martial arts
choreography seen in all the films Underworld imitates, we’re treated to the
dull, aimless rattle of random machine-gun fire. And, the only special effects
worth noting are the werewolves, which do look pretty scary as they crawl along
the walls.
Regardless of how badly this film is sure to perform with critics, droves of
black-clad youngsters alongside the masses of Matrix lovers will seek this film
out, drawn by the promise of rubber outfits, supernatural characters, and all
those guns. And they’ll get all of that; but they’ll walk out baffled and
annoyed by its story and performances. If you’re feeling tempted, just wait for
the rental, and stay home with one of many films Underworld seeks to mimic
instead.
Kneel before Zod.
Reviewer: Annette Cardwell
In my opinion, Underworld was a pretty good movie, and not at all as bad as you
make it out to be. The fighting was a bit straightforward, but who says the
fighting has to be similar to martial arts in order to make it good? The action
that was in the movie was pretty good, despite how traditional it was. I agree
with you on Kravin's acting; it wasn't much at all. I think that the movie's
story line wasn't bad at all and I think it's unfair to put the movie down
altogether. Of course it had a few bad pints but they were very minimal and
nothing that one would notice unless they were looking for it. And as for the
movie being similar to Blade, and other such movies, name a movie that doesnt
have some similarity to another?
Gee I must have seen a different movie. Ok so Kraven wasn't great, but you
totally made the movie sound like a dud I do not agree. I think the Lycans
were awsome. I didn't have alot of problem understanding why there was a
war... if you pay attention it would seem that a vampire and a lycan were
together and caught, the lycan, Lucian, escaped while his wife Sonja was killed
by her own father Viktor... isn't love worth starting a war over? Anyway I
liked the movie and I am not 17 nor a goth.
view all comments (2) - add your comments






