View all comments (1) - Comment on this review

The Time traveler's Wife Movie Review

The Time traveler's Wife Review

"The Time traveler's Wife" Overview

**** stars

Rating: 12
2009


Cast and Crew

Director : Robert Schwentke
Producer : Dede Gardner, Nick Wechsler
Screenwiter : Bruce Joel Rubin
Starring : Eric Bana,Rachel McAdams,Ron Livingston,Stephen Tobolowsky,Arliss Howard,Jane McLean,Philip Craig,Fiona Reid,Brooklynn Proulx,Hailey McCann,Tatum McCann,Michelle Nolden

 
Eric Bana picture 5335444 Eric Bana picture 5335445
 

 

Click for the ERIC BANA Gallery

Adapting Audrey Niffenegger's wonderfully complex novel to the screen can't have been easy, but Rubin (Ghost) has written a thoroughly engaging film. The heavy emotional tone makes it feel a bit girly, but it's still a terrific story. Henry (Bana) has time-travelled since the night his mother (Nolden) died in a car crash. He can't control his "trips", although he seems to go to places with an emotional resonance. When he first meets Clare (McAdams), she's in her 30s and has known him since she was 6 (Proulx). As a result of this paradox, their relationship develops very differently for each of them. Eventually they find friends (Livingston and McLean) who are in on Henry's condition. And a doctor (Tobolowsky) who may be able to help. Director Schwentke invests the film with a lush visual style that circles around the characters as they try to make sense of their life together. Subtle effects and clever editing work extremely well, even if Mychael Danna's music is a little too insistently weepy. And while the premise presents Henry's condition as something like epilepsy, the film can hardly help but start feeling like a terminal illness drama, as signs of impending tragedy start to appear. Bana is good in what's essentially a thankless role. The script doesn't offer him much personality beyond earnestness, so Bana plays him as a nice guy just trying to muddle through. Opposite him, McAdams is a wonderful breath of fresh air, really capturing Clare's steely resolve and quiet pain. Livingston and Tobolowsky are also extremely good in far too few scenes. There's definitely the sense that this film is edited down from a richer, more detailed novel. One problem is that Henry's ageing is far too subtle, so we're never quite sure which time he's travelling from (see Christopher Nolan's Memento or, better yet, Following, for how to do this well). And although we notice loose threads and missing scenes, the editors have done a remarkable job of making such a fragmented tale hold together both emotionally and logically.
And in the end, the film compellingly explores the nature of relationships while quietly moving us to all kinds of tears.



Review by

Rich Cline


click here - Write for us - get your reviews published on Contactmusic
 

Comments

screen name:

crazdmomof4 Click for more info (1)

posted on 31/08/2009 18:29


comments:

I read your review and your assumption that the movie is taken from a much richer novel. Unfortunately it isn't. Like in the movie, the author throws in characters, scenes, and information that goes nowhere. I read the book anticipating an exceptional romance, it wasn't what I got. I wasted precious moments of my life reading the book, and fortunately when I saw the movie was just like the book pointless scenes, I stopped half way through. Its true August is the dump month for bad movies. Despite exceptional actors, this movie is horrendous, and its entirely due to the writing. Like I said with the book review, where was the editor?





View all comments (1) - Comment on this review




©2009 Contactmusic.com Ltd, all rights reserved