View all comments (1) - Comment on this review
The Time traveler's Wife Movie Review
The Time traveler's Wife Review
"The Time traveler's Wife" Overview

Rating: 12
2009
Cast and Crew
Director : Robert SchwentkeProducer : Dede Gardner, Nick Wechsler
Screenwiter : Bruce Joel Rubin
Starring : Eric Bana,Rachel McAdams,Ron Livingston,Stephen Tobolowsky,Arliss Howard,Jane McLean,Philip Craig,Fiona Reid,Brooklynn Proulx,Hailey McCann,Tatum McCann,Michelle Nolden
Adapting Audrey Niffenegger's wonderfully complex novel to the screen can't
have been easy, but Rubin (Ghost) has written a thoroughly engaging film. The
heavy emotional tone makes it feel a bit girly, but it's still a terrific story.
Henry (Bana) has time-travelled since the night his mother (Nolden) died in a
car crash. He can't control his "trips", although he seems to go to places with
an emotional resonance. When he first meets Clare (McAdams), she's in her 30s
and has known him since she was 6 (Proulx). As a result of this paradox, their
relationship develops very differently for each of them. Eventually they find
friends (Livingston and McLean) who are in on Henry's condition. And a doctor
(Tobolowsky) who may be able to help.
Director Schwentke invests the film with a lush visual style that circles
around the characters as they try to make sense of their life together. Subtle
effects and clever editing work extremely well, even if Mychael Danna's music
is a little too insistently weepy. And while the premise presents Henry's
condition as something like epilepsy, the film can hardly help but start
feeling like a terminal illness drama, as signs of impending tragedy start to
appear.
Bana is good in what's essentially a thankless role. The script doesn't offer
him much personality beyond earnestness, so Bana plays him as a nice guy just
trying to muddle through. Opposite him, McAdams is a wonderful breath of fresh
air, really capturing Clare's steely resolve and quiet pain. Livingston and
Tobolowsky are also extremely good in far too few scenes.
There's definitely the sense that this film is edited down from a richer, more
detailed novel. One problem is that Henry's ageing is far too subtle, so we're
never quite sure which time he's travelling from (see Christopher Nolan's
Memento or, better yet, Following, for how to do this well). And although we
notice loose threads and missing scenes, the editors have done a remarkable job
of making such a fragmented tale hold together both emotionally and logically.
And in the end, the film compellingly explores the nature of relationships
while quietly moving us to all kinds of tears.
|
Review by Rich Cline
|
I read your review and your assumption that the movie is taken from a much
richer novel. Unfortunately it isn't. Like in the movie, the author throws in
characters, scenes, and information that goes nowhere. I read the book
anticipating an exceptional romance, it wasn't what I got. I wasted precious
moments of my life reading the book, and fortunately when I saw the movie was
just like the book pointless scenes, I stopped half way through. Its true
August is the dump month for bad movies.
Despite exceptional actors, this movie is horrendous, and its entirely due to
the writing. Like I said with the book review, where was the editor?
View all comments (1) - Comment on this review







