View all comments (1) - Comment on this review
Star Trek (2009) Movie Review
Star Trek (2009) Review

"Star Trek (2009)" Overview

Rating: PG-13
2009
Cast and Crew
Director : J.J. AbramsProducer : Bryan Burk,Roberto Orci,Alex Kurtzman
Screenwiter : Roberto Orci,Alex Kurtzman
Starring : Chris Pine,Zachary Quinto,John Cho,Bruce Greenwood,Simon Pegg,Zoe Saldana
With one film, J.J. Abrams has made Star Trek younger, flashier, sexier,
funnier, and less intelligent, but more exhilarating than it has been in
decades. By altering the franchise's storied past, he ignites a fevered
barn-burner that's geared toward today's action junkies but also sets the stage
for what could be a long and prosperous future.
Abrams' stylized reboot isn't the finest film in the 10-picture series, which
dates back to 1979's Star Trek: The Motion Picture. That distinction still
belongs to the second Trek feature, The Wrath of Khan, though Abrams and
co-screenwriters Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman wisely allow that film to
influence most of their creative decisions.
Like Ricardo Montalban's rage-fuelled Khan, Nero (Eric Bana) is a seemingly
wronged alpha male seeking vengeance against a U.S.S. Enterprise crew member:
Spock, not Kirk, sits in the crosshairs this time around. Time-traveling back
to the moment of a pivotal attack on the U.S.S. Kelvin, Nero unknowingly
interferes with the birth of James T. Kirk, thereby creating an alternate
timeline and freeing Orci and Kurtzman from the hallowed Trek canon.
The bold move also allows Abrams and crew to re-cast Trek characters who have
been ingrained in our pop-culture conscience. Because, as original Kirk William
Shatner prophetically surmised in Khan, "Galloping around the galaxy is a game
for the young."
Abrams' Star Trek splits its focus between the franchise's new Kirk (Chris
Pine) and Spock (Zachary Quinto), explaining how these rebellious teenagers
found their way to Starfleet Command and, in time, aboard the Enterprise as
captain and first mate. But while nods to Trek history are plentiful -- we
witness Kirk cheating his way through the legendary Kobayashi Maru simulation,
his introduction to Leonard "Bones" McCoy (Karl Urban, sufficiently surly), the
recruitment of hapless engineer Scotty (Simon Pegg) -- Abrams' installment
doesn't care to linger in the past. It rockets ever forward on its own original
path, guided by spare-no-expense special effects, healthy character
development, and welcome comic relief.
If anything, Star Trek moves too fast. It's evident from the opening scenes
aboard the Kelvin that this isn't your father's Trek. Dialogue overlaps like an
E.R. episode as Abrams whizzes his cameras as if they're attached to
slingshots. The film's budget is evident in its high-tech scenery -- this is
the best looking Star Trek film, by far -- and extreme-sports action sequences.
But Abrams' direction isn't always smooth -- a mid-air mission involving
parachutes, a drill, ten-foot flames, and a well-calibrated teleportation
boosts your heart rate, even if you're uncertain at times what exactly is going
on. It's possible, even, that the sheer speed of Trek will alienate resolute
Trekkies who preferred Shatner's dramatic pauses and the plausible scientific
storytelling to the adolescent energies of Abrams' pedal-to-the-metal thriller.
No matter which generation of Trek you support -- and that includes you Next
Generation, Voyager, and Deep Space Nine addicts -- it's hard to knock the
solid ensemble, which claims these established characters as their own as they
fall into place for inevitable sequels. Pine leads with his ego but earns
Kirk's heroic swagger. Urban and Anton Yelchin (as Russian whiz kid Pavel
Chekov) are asked to lighten the mood with broad jokes. Quinto's Spock comes
across as unsure, though it's a tough task since we're comparing him to
original Vulcan Leonard Nimoy, who passes the torch in a nostalgic cameo.
The real star, of course, is the Star Trek franchise itself, and it hasn't
risen so high or shone so brightly in years.
Does this flight have a meal service?
|
Review by Sean O'Connell
|
the movie was awful. the storyline shared aspects of the last star trek movie,
Nemesis before this latest one. both movies involved romulans. both storylines
follows romulans using the planet Romulas to want to destroy Earth. the
difference was the additions of stories about the two main characters, spock
and kirk, and better special effects. acting was poor and not convincing. the
actors simply looked too young on screen and it was hard to take them
seriously. the only one worth mentioning was Karl Urban who was spotless as
"Bones" in the movie. old lines from the previous movie and tv series were said
for the sake of saying it. anyone who follows star trek would probably find it
hard to believe that the planet vulcan and romulas can be destroyed so easily.
plus the timeline in the movie did not totally make sense. the movie started
off with kirk's birth, but the next time they faced nero again, it was several
years ahead towards the main part of the movie. if nero's ship could travel
from vulcan to earth that quickly, then what was he waiting for? captain kirk
in that timeline should also not be able to communicate without his
communication device like they did in the star trek next generations. more
serious fans of the star trek series will probably have more questions too. the
movie was poor, too much hype, lacking substance.
View all comments (1) - Comment on this review







