View all comments (1) - Comment on this review

Star Trek (2009) Movie Review

Star Trek (2009) Review

Star trek

"Star Trek (2009)" Overview

**** stars

Rating: PG-13
2009


Cast and Crew

Director : J.J. Abrams
Producer : Bryan Burk,Roberto Orci,Alex Kurtzman
Screenwiter : Roberto Orci,Alex Kurtzman
Starring : Chris Pine,Zachary Quinto,John Cho,Bruce Greenwood,Simon Pegg,Zoe Saldana

 
Chris Pine picture 2436568 Chris Pine picture 2436563
 

 

Click for the CHRIS PINE Gallery

With one film, J.J. Abrams has made Star Trek younger, flashier, sexier, funnier, and less intelligent, but more exhilarating than it has been in decades. By altering the franchise's storied past, he ignites a fevered barn-burner that's geared toward today's action junkies but also sets the stage for what could be a long and prosperous future.

Abrams' stylized reboot isn't the finest film in the 10-picture series, which dates back to 1979's Star Trek: The Motion Picture. That distinction still belongs to the second Trek feature, The Wrath of Khan, though Abrams and co-screenwriters Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman wisely allow that film to influence most of their creative decisions.

Like Ricardo Montalban's rage-fuelled Khan, Nero (Eric Bana) is a seemingly wronged alpha male seeking vengeance against a U.S.S. Enterprise crew member: Spock, not Kirk, sits in the crosshairs this time around. Time-traveling back to the moment of a pivotal attack on the U.S.S. Kelvin, Nero unknowingly interferes with the birth of James T. Kirk, thereby creating an alternate timeline and freeing Orci and Kurtzman from the hallowed Trek canon.

The bold move also allows Abrams and crew to re-cast Trek characters who have been ingrained in our pop-culture conscience. Because, as original Kirk William Shatner prophetically surmised in Khan, "Galloping around the galaxy is a game for the young."

Abrams' Star Trek splits its focus between the franchise's new Kirk (Chris Pine) and Spock (Zachary Quinto), explaining how these rebellious teenagers found their way to Starfleet Command and, in time, aboard the Enterprise as captain and first mate. But while nods to Trek history are plentiful -- we witness Kirk cheating his way through the legendary Kobayashi Maru simulation, his introduction to Leonard "Bones" McCoy (Karl Urban, sufficiently surly), the recruitment of hapless engineer Scotty (Simon Pegg) -- Abrams' installment doesn't care to linger in the past. It rockets ever forward on its own original path, guided by spare-no-expense special effects, healthy character development, and welcome comic relief.

If anything, Star Trek moves too fast. It's evident from the opening scenes aboard the Kelvin that this isn't your father's Trek. Dialogue overlaps like an E.R. episode as Abrams whizzes his cameras as if they're attached to slingshots. The film's budget is evident in its high-tech scenery -- this is the best looking Star Trek film, by far -- and extreme-sports action sequences.

But Abrams' direction isn't always smooth -- a mid-air mission involving parachutes, a drill, ten-foot flames, and a well-calibrated teleportation boosts your heart rate, even if you're uncertain at times what exactly is going on. It's possible, even, that the sheer speed of Trek will alienate resolute Trekkies who preferred Shatner's dramatic pauses and the plausible scientific storytelling to the adolescent energies of Abrams' pedal-to-the-metal thriller.

No matter which generation of Trek you support -- and that includes you Next Generation, Voyager, and Deep Space Nine addicts -- it's hard to knock the solid ensemble, which claims these established characters as their own as they fall into place for inevitable sequels. Pine leads with his ego but earns Kirk's heroic swagger. Urban and Anton Yelchin (as Russian whiz kid Pavel Chekov) are asked to lighten the mood with broad jokes. Quinto's Spock comes across as unsure, though it's a tough task since we're comparing him to original Vulcan Leonard Nimoy, who passes the torch in a nostalgic cameo.

The real star, of course, is the Star Trek franchise itself, and it hasn't risen so high or shone so brightly in years.







Does this flight have a meal service?



Review by

Sean O'Connell


click here - Write for us - get your reviews published on Contactmusic
 

Comments

screen name:

star trek fan  Click for more info ( 1)

posted on 09/05/2009 17:33


comments:

the movie was awful. the storyline shared aspects of the last star trek movie, Nemesis before this latest one. both movies involved romulans. both storylines follows romulans using the planet Romulas to want to destroy Earth. the difference was the additions of stories about the two main characters, spock and kirk, and better special effects. acting was poor and not convincing. the actors simply looked too young on screen and it was hard to take them seriously. the only one worth mentioning was Karl Urban who was spotless as "Bones" in the movie. old lines from the previous movie and tv series were said for the sake of saying it. anyone who follows star trek would probably find it hard to believe that the planet vulcan and romulas can be destroyed so easily. plus the timeline in the movie did not totally make sense. the movie started off with kirk's birth, but the next time they faced nero again, it was several years ahead towards the main part of the movie. if nero's ship could travel from vulcan to earth that quickly, then what was he waiting for? captain kirk in that timeline should also not be able to communicate without his communication device like they did in the star trek next generations. more serious fans of the star trek series will probably have more questions too. the movie was poor, too much hype, lacking substance.





View all comments (1) - Comment on this review




©2009 Contactmusic.com Ltd, all rights reserved