view all comments (1) - add your comments
Mission: Impossible III Movie Review
Mission: Impossible III Review

"Mission: Impossible III" Overview

Rating: PG-13
2006
Cast and Crew
Director : J.J. AbramsProducer : Paula Wagner,Tom Cruise,Stratton Leopold
Screenwiter : Alex Kurtzman,Roberto Orci,J.J. Abrams
Starring : Tom Cruise,Philip Seymour Hoffman,Ving Rhames,Billy Crudup,Michelle Monaghan,Keri Russell
Paramount’s mission sounded impossible. Its assignment? Resurrect Tom Cruise’s
lucrative espionage franchise, which director John Woo left in shambles after
the overly stylish and unreasonably convoluted 2000 installment.
To move forward, the studio and star (a credited producer) looked back – past
the first Mission: Impossible movie to the 1960s television program that
started it all. The M:I team grabbed TV wunderkind J.J. Abrams to direct after
delighting in his original creation Alias, itself a modernized reworking of the
spy show. But Abrams does far more than simply reboot the machine. He provides
a much-needed stab of adrenaline through the franchise’s creative heart.
Action series tend to lose steam by part three, from the Lethal Weapon and Die
Hard movies to Beverly Hills Cop and the recent Terminator sequel. There’s no
such sign of fatigue in Abrams’ Mission, a bang-up extravaganza that wraps its
fingers around our throat during a tightly wound opening scene and rarely
loosens its grip for the two-hour mad dash to the credits.
A decade has passed since we last saw IMF agent Ethan Hunt (Cruise). He has
retired from field work to train recruits, and plans to settle down with lovely
nurse Julia (Michelle Monaghan). When one of Ethan’s pupils (Keri Russell) goes
off the grid while tracking ruthless arms dealer Owen Davian (Philip Seymour
Hoffman), the agency implores him to rejoin the fray and complete her vital
mission.
Most would agree that the first two Mission movies were impossible to follow.
Not so with Abrams’ nail-biter, which enjoys a streamlined plot as it puts Hunt
through the emotional wringer.
While familiar faces are always welcome – Ving Rhames returns to Cruise’s crew
as tech guru Luther Stickell – it’s the newcomers that make memorable marks.
Maggie Q and Jonathan Rhys Meyers contribute to Hunt’s undercover cause, though
the latter appears miffed that he’s following up a winning turn in Woody Allen’
s Match Point with a summer blockbuster. Laurence Fishburne smolders as Hunt’s
IMF supervisor, and Billy Crudup hides secrets as an informative agent.
The key addition is Hoffman, a black-hearted foe forced to match Cruise’s
limitless energy with an unflinching menace. The Oscar winner makes for a
tremendous villain, using cruel intimidation tactics to psychologically destroy
Cruise’s Energizer bunny of a hero.
Abrams’ decision to stick with his tested technical crew helps him
tremendously. He taps Alias writers Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci for an icy
cool screenplay. Composer Michael Giacchino orchestrates a pulse-pounding music
track, the kind he uses on Alias and the island drama Lost to help make those
shows such riveting rides. Behind the camera, Abrams frames his action in
tight, constraining boxes that comfortably suit the larger-than-life Cruise,
making him seem more human, practically vulnerable.
Abrams walks away from Mission as the big winner, stepping up to the plate for
his first feature film and bashing a home run over the left-field fences. His
Mission is relentless in its task, a popcorn thriller that keeps pouring it on.
The tense action sequences are intricate mousetraps of suspense that
continuously stack the odds against Hunt, making us squirm as we wonder how he’
ll triumph. Mission is a blast, a proper kickoff to the summer season. It
proves Hollywood remains capable of staging taut adventures on the big screen,
though it’s going to take innovative small-screen directors like Abrams to
usher in the next wave of potential blockbusters.
Aka Mission: Impossible 3.
Let me rub that for you.
Reviewer: Sean O'Connell
The three mission movies have boring IMF sting operations that panders to undemanding
teenagers. The IMF operations in the tv show had a surreal set-up when they targetted
their enemies. Brian De Palma was given a flat and ordinary screenplay and made it
more interesting then it should have been. De Palma's directing style was perfect
for a mission movie but wasn't given the script that would have made a stunning mission
movie. On mission 2 Tom had Oliver Stone set to direct to only go with John Woo's
lame and bland mission movie. On mission 3 Tom had David Fincher set to direct only
to go with J.J Abrams laughable mission movie where he was reworking the weak formula
of the first two mission movies. If mission for goes ahead pray their is no more
evil IMF agents, and Ethan on the run from the agency. There's a plethora of villians
on the world stage instead on concentrating on corrupt IMF agent. Adults want to
watch these films also, but not when they pander to submoronic teenagers. More inventive
IMF sting operations instead of the three boring mission films the world has been subjected
to. Tom Cruise may have turned the mission films into his own personal bank account
but I'm sure he can improve on the three lousy mission films he has given us.
view all comments (1) - add your comments






