view all comments (1) - add your comments
Love's Labour's Lost Movie Review
Love's Labour's Lost Review

"Love's Labour's Lost" Overview

Rating: PG
2000
Cast and Crew
Director : Kenneth BranaghProducer : David Barron,Kenneth Branagh
Screenwiter : Kenneth Branagh
Starring : Alessandro Nivola,Alicia Silverstone,Natascha McElhone,Kenneth Branagh,Carmen Ejogo,Matthew Lillard,Adrian Lester,Emily Mortimer,Richard Briers
Film musicals are a tough sell these days. It's either the annual Disney
animation vehicle or it's Edward Norton dancing to swing music. I could
probably count the last five years worth of decent musicals on my left hand.
The juxtaposition of dialogue with song and dance always seems to remind me of
the tragedies of my high school drama days. Those damn tights. The bad
pancake makeup.
Kenneth Branagh’s latest Shakespearean opus, Love’s Labour’s Lost, falls into
the category of an ingenious experiment gone horrible wrong. Like a bartender
with one too many vodka-tonics on his breath, Branagh mixes one of Shakespeare’
s lesser-known comedies with the music of Cole Porter and Irving Berlin and
places everything in 1939 France. Think the Rat Pack in some bad 1960s film.
Tell me if this doesn’t seem a bit strange to you: The King of Navarre and his
three best friends decide to put down their swords and seclude themselves from
the world in order to study philosophy and fast from food and comfort for three
years. No women are allowed in the court, and all of them can do great Fred
Astaire impressions. Ummm... sounds a bit kooky to me. The arrival of the
Princess of France and her three maidens sends the boys into a crazed frenzy.
Each of the guys decides to lay down his oath of seclusion and romantically
pursue one special maiden of his choice. War erupts and all four boys must
leave their newfound loves to fight for France’s freedom. Toss in a couple of
supporting characters full of enough shtick to shake a stick at (my lame
attempt at iambic pentameter), comical deception, and bake at 300 degrees for
thirty minutes or until the cheesy top turns a golden brown.
The scariest thing about this film is the decision to cast Alicia Silverstone
as the lead role of the Princess of France. Has Branagh been doing drugs to
suppress the memory of his role in last year’s cinematic opus Wild Wild West?
When Silverstone appears in the film and starts spouting Shakespearean
dialogue, all I could see was her character Cher from Clueless performing a
really, really bad Shakespearean oral report for her English final. It's a bit
jarring at first to watch the actors move from the complicated dialogue of the
play to the memorable songs of Gershwin, Porter, and Berlin: Sinatra and Dino
are probably calling Branagh the “biggest palooka from Endsville” from the
great beyond right now. Branagh also pulls the same mistake as Woody Allen did
in his attempt at a musical by hiring actors that could’t even sing and dance
for change on the street.
It’s also a damn shame that this film doesn’t work on the whole. Branagh’s
directing is crisp and original. The inclusion of newsreel-style footage about
the King’s exploits makes for smart scene changes. The entire cast, with the
strong exception of the Batgirl, runs the difficult dialogue with great ease.
The costumes, makeup, and set design are amazing.
The most problematic thing about the film is that it would have been a success
if only Branagh had stuck to the actual text of the play without the
distractions of the music.
One thing’s for sure... Branagh ain’t no song and dance man.
Smokin' chicks.
Reviewer: Max Messier
Hello, Mr. Blackwelder. I think your review is very good. However, you might have
given credit to the Weinstein brothers for having produced the file. If Ralph is
your dad, please tell him I send my best wishes. Thank you.
haicino@fuse.net
Harvey A. Immerman
view all comments (1) - add your comments






