View all comments (6) - Comment on this review
Jane Eyre Movie Review
Jane Eyre Review

"Jane Eyre" Overview

Rating: PG
1996
Cast and Crew
Director : Franco ZeffirelliProducer : Dyson Lovell
Screenwiter : Hugh Whitmore,Franco Zeffirelli
Starring : William Hurt,Charlotte Gainsbourg,Joan Plowright,Anna Paquin,Geraldine Chaplin,Elle Macpherson
One of these days, Hollywood is going to run out of old Brontė sisters/Jane
Austen books to make into films. Then, and only then, will the world be safe
once again.
Don't get me wrong, I loved Sense And Sensibility (it even made my 1995 top ten
list), but I gave Persuasion one of the worst reviews of the year. Here comes
Jane Eyre to follow in the latter's footsteps.
Jane Eyre is based on one of those books you were supposed to read in high
school (entitled, oddly, Jane Eyre), but which was so damn boring you couldn't
even get through the Cliff's Notes. The film is almost as exciting as one
would expect a film about, say, the book, Jane Eyre, to be. It's full of
longing glances, Jane (Charlotte Gainsbourg) staring into the hills of England,
Jane prancing through the meadow, Jane in a carriage, and important lines like,
"He is a proud man." And, sadly, not much else.
The hopelessly archaic story is one of love and idiocy in the early 1800s, when
men could keep their insane first wives locked up in the spare room of the
castle (those were the days!). It was also a time when, for no apparent
reason, you could expect a young governess to fall in love with her invalid
boss. There are some other plot points of note, but really, who cares? There
are much better things to laugh about! Such as:
Gainsbourg, best described as a British girl with a really long neck and really
fat cheeks, was recently seen in the film Kung Fu Master! Who better to play
Ms. Eyre, really? Anna Paquin plays Young Jane but is completely devoid of the
charm that endeared her to me in The Piano (and won her an Oscar). Elle
Macpherson is Rochester's girly friend (inexplicably jilted in the second film
within a month)! Maria Schneider pulls off a totally toys-in-the-attic
portrayal of Blanche, the crazy first wife. Amanda Root, who sucked in
Persuasion, doesn't suck as badly here, but still causes me to break out in
hives when she's on screen (fortunately briefly). And...the kicker...William
Hurt as Rochester!? Ho ho ho!
As if the casting and acting weren't enough to make this a bomb, we've got an
interminable story that just won't end, a really dumb ending when it finally
does, half of the audience laughing at the "high drama," the other half asleep,
and, worst of all, a film that is so archaic and out-of-date that it's almost
insulting to watch. How helpful and/or truly relevant is this story of
Victorian obsession and self-destruction today? Who would act in a manner
remotely similar to these people, except my psychopathic ex who fancied herself
to be Blanche (but that's another story)? Putting it all together, Jane Eyre
manages to be not just a very bad movie, but to be irresponsible as well. Keep
away.
Jane, searching for a clue, somewhere--anywhere.
|
Review by Christopher Null
|
that was a very harsh review of the movie. The book was wonderful, and the
movie was great with the portral of each of the Characters. William Hurt did a
great job of playing Mr. Rochester. I guess to appreciate the movie, you have
to enjoy the book, and be a romantic who enjoys "out-of-date" literature.
Re Jane Eyre: I think you were too harsh. I've just discovered the DVD & was
quite taken with it. Admittedly the story is very dated but I enjoyed the
preformances of the main characters, especially William Hurt as Mr Rochester.
To enjoy Jane Eyre you must be a real romantic I suppose!
View all comments (6) - Comment on this review







