view all comments (1) - add your comments
Hostel: Part II Movie Review
Hostel: Part II Review

"Hostel: Part II" Overview

Rating: R
2007
Cast and Crew
Director : Eli RothProducer : Eli Roth,Mike Fleiss,Chris Briggs
Screenwiter : Eli Roth
Starring : Lauren German,Roger Bart,Bijou Phillips,Heather Matarazzo,Vera Jordanova,Richard Burgi,Jay Hernandez
Let's lay the cards on the table: Hostel, to me, was one of the coldest, most
blindly-conceived horror films to get released in years, basically acting as
torture porn rather than an actual film. So, the fact that Hostel: Part II is
more thuggishly ambivalent to thought and structure, more cold and
condescending to its audience and its characters, and more wildly absurd in
both tone and execution doesn't come as a surprise. To be honest, it makes
sense that after two thoroughly fascinating horror experiments (Bug and 28
Weeks Later) are released that Hostel: Part II will easily make enough money to
secure a third installment and will set the horror genre back a solid decade.
Basically, Part II is Hostel plus a B-cup. Three girls (Lauren German, Bijou
Phillips, and Heather Matarazzo) are in Europe studying art. One of the models
for the art course is a statuesque beauty (Vera Jordanova) who befriends the
girls and starts a friendship with one girl that borders on lesbianism. Of
course, the model gets them to go to a special hot springs and stay at a
hostel. Shortly after arriving, the girls are drugged, dragged, and prepped for
a slab or a death seat.
Oh! I almost forgot. This time we also get to know the killers involved.
There's the superior sportsman (Richard Burgi) and his pseudo-homosexual
family-man friend (Roger Bart) who win the right to torture two of the girls
for a solid fifty grand. We are let into the process of preparation: a tattoo
must be acquired, tools for your session must be selected, and cheap, hollow
emotions must be administered. Then when it's time to get down to business, the
film, as if knowledgeable about how deep its ditch is, puts the
pedal-to-the-metal and rushes through its last third.
What becomes most troubling in both instances of Hostel is its utter disregard
for enjoyment coupled with a stunningly vapid sense of purpose. What one
basically learns in the first Hostel is that foreigners are out to steal your
money, torture you, and then kill you in très gruesome fashion. Oh, and women
who want to sleep with you are in on it too! And yet, there's no sense of
thrill in these scenes of terror, no sense of the macabre. Frankly, these
moments of grandiose torment aren't even that creative; they're just shown to
us, without any wit, taste, or thought. It could just be a horrendous remake of
a decent snuff film Roth once saw.
Ostentatiously decking out the film with two major torture set-pieces, Roth
makes the audio track a long clip of girls squealing, crying, pleading and
whimpering for some salvation from the godless cathedral of pain, and this
painful piece of ineptitude the actresses are stuck in. The director, who came
on strong with his campy debut Cabin Fever, has regressed into a state of
bratty cynicism, basically doing a big-boy take on frying ants on the sidewalk
with a magnifying glass. Who am I kidding? Roth probably poured gasoline on the
poor critters, flicked open the Zippo and attempted not to salivate too heavy.
My only prayer is that this isn't happening outside his house right now.
Aka Hostel Part 2, Hostel 2.
Wienerdog, inverted.
Reviewer: Chris Cabin
Kdybych nepochazel z Cech,tak bych to jeste jako parodii na horror bral,ale
jelikoz pochazim z Cech,tamohu klidne rici,ze takovou blbou slataninu jsem v
zivote nevidel,a docela silne me tento vytvor pobouril,vystoupit z vlaku v
Poricanech a byt na slovensku v Bratislave,opravdu zajimave,asi bych to mel
brat jako sc-fi horror.Nic moc pane!!!
s pozdrvem Kelis
view all comments (1) - add your comments






