View all comments (2) - Comment on this review

Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed Movie Review

Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed Review

"Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed" Overview

** stars

Rating: PG
2008


Cast and Crew

Director : Nathan Frankowski
Producer : Logan Craft,Walt Ruloff
Screenwiter : Kevin Miller,Walt Ruloff,Ben Stein
Starring : Ben Stein,Jason Collett

 
Ben Stein picture 1628191 Ben Stein picture 1628195
 

 

Click for the BEN STEIN Gallery

Who would have thought that Ben Stein, the game show host and famously drab economics teacher in Ferris Bueller's Day Off, would one day become the leading apologist for the theory of intelligent design? Not me. But that's life for you -- a surprise around every corner. Stein is the central figure in the new film, Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, a fire-bomb documentary meant to burn down the house of "Big Science," whose members, according to the film, have silenced all dissent from the theory of evolution and are actively engaged in the persecution of anyone who doesn't toe the party line.

Expelled works in much the same way as a Michael Moore documentary -- a raft of provocation and very little persuasion. It starts out by serving up a few case histories of scientists who publicly declared their sympathy for intelligent design. In each case, five i n all, reaction from the scientific establishment was swift. Tenure was denied, contracts weren't renewed, websites were taken down, etc. Expelled would have you believe that these cases represent instances of grave injustice and the contravention of academic freedom, but it's poorly argued and lacks evidence. Tenure is often denied. Contracts frequently aren't renewed. That's life, especially in academia. More evidence is required to build a compelling case, and the makers of Expelled don't want to get bogged down in chronicling academic intrigues. Can't say I blame them, but their lack of rigor doesn't help their cause.

Expelled then goes on to interview a number of proponents of intelligent design. Each of them sounds smart, obviously more knowledgeable about science and the origin of life than I am, but the film fails to define exactly what these men think and what they're proposing. I understand they reject the theory of evolution. I understand that intelligent design involves a "designer." But what else? What would intelligent design research contribute to the body of science literature? How would intelligent design researchers test their claims? Unfortunately, the film doesn't bother to provide answers to these questions.

Perhaps the worst part of Expelled comes when Stein tries to connect the theory of evolution and Nazism. While it's true that Hitler used Darwin's theories to support his ideology, it's intellectually dishonest to associate, however tenuously, today's scientific community with Nazism. Too often in today's public discourse, people feel it's not enough merely to assert that their ideological opponent is wrong -- they must also claim he's evil. This is shameless demagoguery, and it's not persuasive or constructive.

Another component of Expelled is interviews with leading scientists -- such as Richard Dawkins, author of The God Delusion -- who seem thrilled at the chance to ridicule not only intelligent design and its proponents but all people of faith. In interviews leading up to the release of Expelled, many of these scientists have said that their quotes were taken out of context and that the filmmakers misrepresented themselves in the interviews. Listening to these men throughout the course of the movie, it's hard to feel much sympathy for them. As poorly as Stein and the rest of the makers of Expelled acquit themselves in the film, Dawkins and his cohorts are every bit as vicious.

And that's the one thing that Expelled manages to expose -- the rancor and malice on both ends of this issue. It isn't an argument so much as it's a war, complete with soldiers and battles and funding and propaganda. Expelled isn't a thoughtfully rendered documentary about the freedom of inquiry; it's a shot across the bow of the scientific establishment. And it just doesn't work.


Reviewer: Matt McKillop


click here - Write for us - get your reviews published on Contactmusic

Comments

screen name:

A fact checker Click for more info (1)

posted on 03/05/2008 08:04


comments:

One of the truly strange things about this "documentary" is its failure to create a companion website with the facts mentioned in the film. There's good reason for that failure! Each of the stories of the five "expelled" is fundamentally flawed. The actual stories of the five are well-covered, with footnotes, in the Wikipedia entry for this website. Just go to wikipedia.org and search for expelled no intelligence Most egregious is the story of the "fired" Smithsonian researcher. He was never ever an employee of the Smithsonian in the first place, and continues to have what he always did: a volunteer position with that institution. The webpage also documents the gross distortions to Darwin's quote: it shows the words the filmmakers "quoted" and Darwin's actual words. One must ask: if this "documentary" had a case to make, why didn't they bother to do a fundamental fact-check on what they presented? To anyone wanting to watch this film, I strongly recommend checking this website FIRST.




screen name:

a yank Click for more info (1)

posted on 02/05/2008 18:53


comments:

Stein is no dummy. In fact he was the top of his class at Yale Law school in 1970. No one is debating that change happens over time. What is in question is whether or not it is random mutation or the intentional effort of a creator that is responsible for the design which we see as scientists. It is the theology of Darwinism that has become problematic. If the hypothesis is that "random" action and mutation caused the life and the complexity we see around us and under the microscope, then we must PROVE that this is likely. We can't begin to do so. Darwinist have no idea how life began. No idea how all the information provided by DNA got there in the first place. NO IDEA. Some of us think we see evidence of a creator in the evidence that is comin g forward. We think the evidence points toward intentionality and stands against those who claim the complexity we see is an accident. One could argue that this doesn't add much to the scientific endeavor, and I might agree. However, an atheistic interpretation doesn't add a lot either. Dawkins is a philosopher pretending to be a scientist. His evidence does not prove that God is not involved in the creation of life or its progress across the ages. I don't have a problem with many of Darwin's ideas, but when Darwinism crosses over to metaphysics it has ceased to be science and it is increasingly obvious that it can not sustain its metaphysical claims. Because this is true, a debate of other options seems appropriate.





View all comments (2) - Comment on this review




©2009 Contactmusic.com Ltd, all rights reserved