Envy (2000) Movie Review
Envy (2000) Review

"Envy (2000)" Overview

Rating: NR
2000
Cast and Crew
Director : Julie MoneyProducer : Michael Cook
Screenwiter : Jeff Truman
Starring : Linda Cropper,Anna Lise Phillips,Jeff Truman,Scott Major,Abbie Tucker,Wade Osbourne
The basic thriller usually stays in its tight little confines – it vies with
others in the genre for the most shocks and twists, leaving its characters as
cardboard playthings. Sometimes though, as in the case of Envy (screened at
the 2000 Boston Film Festival), the thrills are really a catalyst for something
bigger. Director Julie Money’s Australian feature veers slightly around the
same old stuff and creates an interesting and new mix of character study, role
reversal, and sexual politics.
The story is basic, but its presentation is tantalizingly off-kilter. Envy
opens with a fragment from a scene that doesn’t appear fully until the film’s
climax, a device reminiscent of Steven Soderbergh’s The Limey. It whets the
appetite, draws a little confusion, and sets up the possibility for
unconventional storytelling. It’s simple: A girl sits in a mall food court,
looks at the camera, and then leaves.
The bulk of the setup is simple too – Kate (Linda Cropper), a married
professional with a young son, spies a gorgeous young girl at the local pool,
wearing what she believes is her stolen black dress. When the girl jumps in
for a swim, Kate swipes it and bolts. When the beautiful Rachel (Anna Lise
Phillips) and her two scuzzball friends come calling for the dress back, the
results are brutal. The actions turn Kate’s family upside-down, and stir in
her a passionate revenge, combining a modern woman’s power with a dangerous
taste for retribution.
It’s that change in Kate (or is it a change?) that gives Envy its step above
normalcy, its extra set of layers that make it worth watching. Cropper, who
reminds me of Janet McTeer, plays Kate as tough and calculated. We can
sympathize when she explains to her oaf of a husband why rape doesn’t have to
include actual penetration, but we wonder how long she’ll foolishly stalk her
enemies. Cropper’s got the load of carrying Envy, and she performs well, save
for some overly earnest delivery here and there.
But is all this just about a missing dress? It’s obviously much bigger, and in
a framework that Kurosawa or Leigh would appreciate, it has to do with class
structure. Kate’s family lives in a broad, beautifully appointed home,
complete with a stylish fountain/pool; Rachel’s “family” lives in a shack in
another part of town. Kate owns, and wears, at least two other black dresses,
and even wears a negligee that looks exactly like that little dress; Rachel and
friends seem to wear the same clothes each time we see them. While some of the
comparisons do come across as simplistic (why is Rachel’s group so inherently
evil anyway?), they make for an exciting use of set design and wardrobe,
providing an excellent set of rules to toy with.
Although Envy could easily have worked as a play, Money makes her study solely
cinematic. She uses basic visual tricks of compressing time and space to
heighten scares, alter points-of-view, and just keep things moving in general.
And while some of the thrills are of the cheap Hollywood variety, Envy, as a
whole, is not.
Tough titty.
Reviewer: Norm Schrager



