Emma Movie Review
Emma Review

"Emma" Overview

Rating: PG
1996
Cast and Crew
Director : Douglas McGrathProducer : Patrick Cassavetti,Steven Haft
Screenwiter : Douglas McGrath
Starring Gwyneth Paltrow, Greta Schacchi, Jeremy Northam, Toni Collette, Alan Cumming, Juliet Stevenson, Polly Walker, James Cosmo, Ewan Mcgregor, Sophie Thompson, Phyllida Law
O! The plight of wealthy twentysomethings in England at the beginning of the
19th century.
Such is the rather large pill you are supposed to swallow if you truly want to
enjoy Emma, the latest in the incessant parade of increasingly bad adaptations
of so-called "classic" novels.
Emma is the second time in about a year that Jane Austen's book of the same
name has been adapted. The last time was the clueless Clueless, and it'd be
hard for me to decide which one is worse. At least Clueless was supposed to be
a joke. Emma has all the misplaced seriousness of a documentary on genital
warts.
Emma (Gwyneth Paltrow) is a flighty little matchmaker, never seeking her own
marital happiness, but delighting in that of others. The first half hour of
Emma shows us her matchmaking attempts with friend Miss Smith (Toni Collette).
As no other plot lines are developed in 30 minutes, I thought it safe to assume
this was what the movie was going to be about. No such luck, because in the
second half hour, a parade of 15 or 20 or 8 billion supporting characters
waltzes through the scenes. Each is called Mister or Miss or Mrs. Something,
and each of them looks and acts exactly the same (obnoxious). (I defy you to
tell the difference at all between Polly Walker's character and Greta
Scacchi's.) It's a shame that great acting talents like the above, Ewan
McGregor, Alan Cummings, Jeremy Northam, and Juliet Stevenson are all pretty
much wasted.
Anyway, Emma finds herself in quite the predicament when she finds her
matchmaking blowing up in her face and realizes she herself is falling for
various supporting characters. (Oh, my!) The problem with all of this is
that, to a one, all of the characters are loathsome. Combined with the
overacting that generally comes along with period flicks like this, you come up
with a long-as-sin, pointless film.
Then again, Emma has a couple of charms, notably some nice scenery, upon which
are placed hordes of actresses in those horrid Coke bottle-shaped dresses that
made fashion victims out of a generation of Britons. And the credits aren't
too bad.
Final note: Why is it called Emma when everyone refers to her as Miss
Woodhouse? Discuss amongst yourselves.
Want to see Roger Ebert's quote of this review? CLICK HERE!
Behind the scenes on the set of Emma: Paltrow and Northam take shots at the
director.
Reviewer: Christopher Null





