view all comments (1) - add your comments
Birth Movie Review
Birth Review

"Birth" Overview

Rating: R
2004
Cast and Crew
Director : Jonathan GlazerProducer : Lizie Gower,Nick Morris,Jean-Louis Piel,Wang Wei
Screenwiter : Milo Addica,Jean-Claude Carrière,Jonathan Glazer
Starring Nicole Kidman, Cameron Bright, Danny Huston, Lauren Bacall, Alison Elliott
Jonathan Glazer’s stylish debut Sexy Beast stood out for the
uncharacteristically explosive and vicious performance the director coaxed out
of stately Ben Kingsley. Evidence of any such energy all but escapes Birth,
Glazer’s anticipated follow-up to his kinetic gangster picture. A plodding and
pretentious thriller, this beyond-the-grave affair ends up being too art-house
for the mainstream crowd and too mainstream for the art-house crowd. Loosely
translated, that means it doesn’t work for anyone.
Birth hangs its hat on a delicate premise that demands kid gloves if it
seriously hopes to sustain the already shaky credibility. An elegant transition
of life forces starts the film. Physician Sean dies while jogging.
Simultaneously, a baby is born. Fast forward 10 years, where a cave-eyed child
coincidentally named Sean (Cameron Bright) claims to Upper West Side basket
case Anna (Nicole Kidman) that he is her reincarnated ex-husband. Anna’s
humorless fiancée (Danny Huston) scoffs at the idea. Her mother (a neglected
Lauren Bacall) displays indifference. (“I never liked Sean, anyway,” she
articulates.) But Anna’s not so quick to write the boy off.
Shot under inadequate light and paced like a slug dragging a jet ski, Birth
would gladly trade its right arm for the pleasure of being described as
atmospheric. I’m going to go with “sedated beyond the point of feeling.” Glazer’
s steady camera lingers for what seems to be an eternity on his leading lady’s
concerned face, hoping beyond hope to capture vital emotions of longing, guilt,
grief, or suspicion. None register. Meanwhile, the naturally spooky Bright
perfects these monotonous, robotic line readings, but little else. He states
with no real enthusiasm, “I’m Sean,” then waits for everyone to believe him.
You’d imagine Sean’s reincarnated spirit would be confused or upset. Bright has
one facial expression – sleepy – so he can only carry his role so far.
Hard as this is to believe, but Glazer’s cast actually entertains the notion of
reincarnation, toying with the idea that this kid could be Sean. The trouble is
we never share the group’s blind faith. Most of the time, Anna and Sean behave
like they have a valuable piece of information we haven’t seen or won’t be
given. A key is eventually produced to unlock the film’s secrets, but the
solution to young Sean’s insistence is laughably preposterous. Either Sean is
Anna’s dead husband or he isn’t. By its final frame, Birth manages to avoid
deciding on either option.
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
Reviewer: Sean O'Connell
This is to comment less about Birth, than to profile from the masses about
Shaun O'Connell's abilities as reviewer. So we'll make my most aggressive
statement first: he ranks somewhere below the Chicago Cupcake. Based upon the
review done on Birth, it is obvious that he did not see the movie, or did see
"Tarzan runs for President". Every observation O'Connell made about scene
details was so far from reality that we suspect he had been paid to rue
ridicule upon the movie, the director, and especially Ms Kidman. All his
summaries were specious, and his urgings painted him, not his victims, with a
brown colour. May we respectfully ask that he return to Nature, or at least
change profession?
view all comments (1) - add your comments






