view all comments (3) - add your comments
Alexander Movie Review
Alexander Review

"Alexander" Overview

Rating: R
2004
Cast and Crew
Director : Oliver StoneProducer : Moritz Borman,Thomas Schuhly,Oliver Stone,Jon Kilik,Iain Smith
Screenwiter : Christopher Kyle,Oliver Stone,Laeta Kalogridis
Starring : Colin Farrell,Rosario Dawson,Anthony Hopkins,Angelina Jolie,Val Kilmer
To paraphrase the obnoxious David Spade, I liked Alexander a lot… when it was
called Troy.
In fact, Oliver Stone’s overblown biopic detailing the global conquests of
Alexander the Great (Colin Farrell) would make a nice bookend to Wolfgang
Petersen’s lopsided sword-and-sandal epic. One day you’ll be able to tap
Netflix for the two titles and combine them for a battle-worthy double feature.
You’ll only need an entire weekend to wrap it up.
In the film, Alexander (Colin Farrell), the bastard son of Philip of Macedonia
(Val Kilmer), becomes king of the known world by age 25. Starting in Greece,
the insatiable scourge moves his devoted army east, swallowing up new lands and
cultures like Fear Factor contestants swallow cow eyeballs. Rarely satisfied by
combat or carnal knowledge, Alexander splits his devotions between an Asian
wife (a surprisingly lifeless Rosario Dawson) and his male lover Hephaestion (a
not-so-surprisingly lifeless Jared Leto). Meanwhile, back home in Macedonia,
Alexander’s mother Olympias (Angelina Jolie) begs like a leech to be part of
her son’s growing kingdom.
By chronicling the Greek ruler’s military training and gradual empire spreading
through Asia, Stone’s Alexander can be exotic, erotic, and elongated past the
point of consideration. Blood flows (and flows) but the proceedings are far
from memorable. Everything simply seems big, from Stone’s grandiose set pieces
to the elaborate but poorly executed battle sequences. Even the ample score by
a pulled-back-into-the-limelight Vangelis (Blade Runner), suggests a grandeur
this film hardly ever earns. It’s a big misfire, a big bore, and a big fat
waste of time.
Beyond the desire to recreate history, Stone frequently has been attracted to
power figures who ascend to their thrones rather quickly, then fight to
maintain their positions. Alexander is no different, and like Stone’s stabs at
American history (JFK, Nixon), the director’s passion for his subject gives way
to dramatic excess, leading to overwrought pomp crushed by its own weight and
lack of accomplishment.
Alexander’s humanitarian efforts (connect the lands to benefit the people) are
lost in Stone’s portrayal of ruler-as-rock star. Which, of course, make Farrell
a great choice to play the lead. The actor’s own ego-fueled swagger actually
helps his Alexander. We believe he’s passionate enough to inspire an army, and
he’s a natural when it comes to enjoying the spoils of victory. Stone’s costume
designer eventually lets Farrell down, though, as Alexander evolves into a
drunken Jeff Spicoli in India, then morphs into a feather-coifed Sebastian Bach
from Skid Row by the time he returns to Babylon.
Stone’s supporting cast, though, desperately tries to match the director’s vast
vision with bombastic bouts of overacting. Kilmer, with his eye sealed shut,
channels the late Jim Morrison as if he were still playing the Lizard King on
the set of Stone’s The Doors. Jolie goes so far beyond vamp that she reaches
vampire, soaking every line with a Transylvanian accent. It’s laughable. A
friend asked me on the way out to name Stone’s last good film. I couldn’t. If
Alexander signals the end for the once-maverick filmmaker, at least he went out
with a bang.
Take us to that awesome rave they had in The Matrix!
Reviewer: Sean O'Connell
Sean O'Connell's review of Alexander is complete and utter tripe. It is trash
reviews like his that cause alot of great movies to go unseen. I have seen
Alexander (both the theatrical and director's cut versions) and they are both
excellent. I will admit however that the theactrical version does not flow as
good as the director's cut (see both of them and you'll see why), but it is
still equally as enjoyable. Thank goodness there are some people out there that
still have a brain to think for themselves, as I would urge anyone who reads
O'Connell's article to do. Watch Alexander and see for yourself.
I agree with most of the review. Alexander has done so many things and fought
countless of battles, and it's a shame to neglect that in order to drag on with
the boring-to-death scenes with Hopkins.
However, it's impossible to fit Alexander's life into one movie. They should
have done it as a series instead, like Rome, with (mostly) the same cast,
ofcourse. That would have been more fair to Alexander - and to Stone.
I don't recommend the theatrical version or the Director's Cut, though. Final
Cut is where it's at. A longer version of the film always improves it; too bad
movie goers don't have the patience for a long film, or Alexander would have
had more success.
The same fate struck Kingdom of Heaven as well; as Fox ordered it to be cut
down (the action scenes are what matters; the rest they don't give a rat's ass
about) the movie turned out hideous and nothing made any sense what so ever.
But the Director's Cut really turned it into a whole new movie, but
unfortunately most people won't see it.
Back to Alexander; despite its faults it should have gotten atleast 2 stars.
They gave it a good try (although a kiss or a more intimate moment between
Alexander and Hephaistion shouldn't have been that hard to add in the movie,
now would it?), and most of the actors were amazing. I had my doubts about
Colin Farrell in the beginning, but he covinced me throughout the movie that he
could do a good job. Jared Leto is gorgeous and managed to pull off Hephaistion
very well. Kilmer is *perfect*. The boy playing young Alexander did an amazing
job, too bad he doesn't seem to get enough credit for it.
If you haven't seen the film yet, or is willing to give it another try, get
your hands on the Final Cut. (the Director's Cut is shorter than the original
version, and has also cut off most of the homoerotic scenes, which is a great
shame.)
view all comments (3) - add your comments






