view all comments (4) - add your comments
3:10 to Yuma Movie Review
3:10 to Yuma Review

"3:10 to Yuma" Overview

Rating: R
2007
Cast and Crew
Director : James MangoldProducer : Cathy Konrad
Screenwiter : Halsted Welles,Derek Haas,Michael Brandt
Starring : Christian Bale,Russell Crowe,Ben Foster,Dallas Roberts,Peter Fonda,Gretchen Mol,Alan Tudyck,Logan Lerman
Based on a short story by Elmore Leonard, a writer known more for loan sharks
and confidence men than ruthless bandits and old-soul lawmen, 3:10 to Yuma
originally sold Glenn Ford as slick outlaw Ben Wade and Van Heflin as Dan
Evans, the rancher burdened with delivering Wade to a prison train heading to
Yuma. Directed in 1957 by Delmer Daves, the original was a perversely intimate
piece of rawhide for a genre that already prided itself on its strange
seclusion.
Fit for our time, Evans is now played by master of reticence Christian Bale and
Wade is now played by a rough-and-tumble Russell Crowe with just the right hint
of sadism. Evans' cathartic mission to get Wade on the train to the gallows now
spans three days rather than one, and Bale's cavalry includes Alan Tudyck and
Peter Fonda. To give room for the new additions, director James Mangold
stretches Daves' film from its airtight 90-minute runtime to a full two hours,
throwing in a father-and-son angle and a chase through a railroad path being
built by Chinese laborers. The man who keeps the Chinese in line? Luke Wilson,
of course.
The Yuma for our generation doesn't really need to be a Western, it just needs
to load its six-shooter and shine its spurs for the audience. Space and staging
are neglected in Yuma's veneer, but the film's visceral tempo brings on instant
engagement. At one point, a horse with a bag of dynamite on its saddle is shot
and blows up, reminiscent of the car explosions in Live Free or Die Hard. If
the film fails as a Western across the boards, it succeeds as a dumb action
film simply by looking different than what we're used to. Every shoot-out and
face-off is fully mechanized, and the script, flimsy in dialogue and light on
ideas, has a staid, calculated structure.
The quiet, insular character that Bale has refined over the years doesn't fit
the morally-confused Evans, who takes the job on the promise of a hefty
payment. The slow moral realization that Heflin was perfect at revealing never
makes it in Bale's hands. Better-suited Crowe comes on with full movie-villain
bravado, playing the love-to-hate-'em card with full zeal. Both, however, are
constantly upstaged by Ben Foster, who plays Wade's right-hand man Charlie
Prince. Where Bale and Crowe struggle to find footing in the script's fumbling
moralistic manhunt, Foster is clear-eyed and fierce, screaming "This town is
gonna burn!" as if it were a judgment handed down from the Almighty.
Mangold's filmmaking here is sturdy, but the storytelling is cheap and the
film's sincerity is shallow. Akin to Walk the Line, the drama melts into cheap,
derivative sentimentality and relies solely on the actors, taking away any
stress on imagery or pacing. Though its entertainment value is undeniable, the
lack of depth and complexity lead to the film's hollow climax and preposterous
conclusion like a speeding train with no conductor. In attempting to moralize
the filth of the old West, Mangold sells out the genre's strongest asset. You
can see it as Ford's pearl necklace is traded for Crowe's pencil sketches; the
shot of whiskey traded in for green tea.
Who done sawed off my shotgun?
Reviewer: Chris Cabin
The reviewer is correct - the climax is hollow and preposterous and for many (including
the reviewer) ultimately undermines the overall merit of the film. I suspect the
producers and director intended to produce a farce. They certainly have done so.
When viewed as a film in that genre, it is immensely enjoyable. I enjoyed immensely.
Pukuboynz
I love watching logan lerman in this move it made him super hott!!
view all comments (4) - add your comments






