Former Rolling Stones Boss Boasts Over Verve Track Victory Message Board and Comments

It is ridiculous.. THE COPYRIGHT LAW ALLOWS USE WITH PERSMISSION , RICHARD and the boys were duped and scammed . I would appeal it if I was you guys. I would want to make sure that the bars used were even the bars in the ROllingstone song as you know that needs to be established by the listeners and not just by the judge. If it was then : as permit was given anyway it is only the % share of the Smash HIt Bitter sweet symphony that they are to get.: ROYALTY PAYMENT and not the whole thing.. Thirdly I would recover all of my monies from ALLEN then from Nike for illegal sale and purchasing of something that was stolen that was not theirs as the VERVES SONG is a protectible work in itself[ a sperate piece of work in itself] and not the property of ALLEN AND CO. Elizabeth F Obisanya CASHBACK paper or plastic CASHBACK v OH HAPPY DAY court victory.

I can understand why the Stones went after the royalties of the Verve's song "Bittersweet Symphony" 10 years later... They need the money. Give me a break. Or give the artist a break for turning a average song into a masterpiece. I guess you can say it's their best hit in 10 years! Literally!!!