Debbie Rowe Jackson Not Father Of My Kids Message Board and Comments



Comments

screen name:

Specialk Click for more info ( 1)

posted on 30/07/2009 16:35


comments:

I adored Michael Jackson just like millions of his fans, but this mans personal life needs to be put to rest just like his corpse. No one truly knows what happeded but him and he is gone now. It is very respectful from the media and some of public eye towards his family in reagards to whatever this man has gone through or whatever problems he has left behind. Why run the mans name in the "Mud" after he is dead. Let us all consider his kids and his family (excluding Joe Jackson) to mourn his death and get on with their lives.




screen name:

nicelady Click for more info ( 1)

posted on 13/07/2009 01:26


comments:

Debbie Rowe might have loved Michaeal but it was one sided. She decided to have children for him for that is what he really wanted. Michael was a wonderful father and loves them dearly; Debbie Rowe also stated that she left them with their father, the only parent they know who cared and neutured them. She is not a mother when you take money in return for them and definately does not deserve to have them now that Michael is gone. These children are smart and is old enough to say whom they will want to live with. The Jackson family ( all members)will always love them. Debbie Rowe don't know them, their personalities etc. The fathers name is on their birth certificates and that is the most important thing of all. It's SAD that she is trying to take them away from people that they love for money.




screen name:

njmarlo Click for more info ( 1695)

posted on 12/07/2009 16:33


comments:

michael should be honored, not eternally villified. if debbie and katherigotne raise the children, i say go to it. if katherine and debbie agreed, that is a miracle.




screen name:

MJ'sfather@dearest Click for more info (2)

posted on 12/07/2009 04:09


comments:

Unless someone was there in the Jackson-Rowe home, HOW would anyone KNOW whether their marriage was a sexual one or not. It's quite feasible she got pregnant with BOTH their children, via IVF. That is and CAN BE DONE! Sperm or no sperm, who cares? Dr. Arnie Klein hasn't said yes, he hasn't said no, that HE'S the biological father. Why don't those who question the paternity and/or maternity, buy any magazine showing the two children, just gaze at each child and decide, who do you see, Debbie and/or Michael? The reality is... these two kids have a biological father and mother and as long as the three of them are taken care of, whether it's Katherine Jackson (as indicated in MJ's Will) or....Diana Ross. It seems that because Debbie has come forward to say SHE wants custody rather than Katherine Jackson, the proceedings have been put on hold. This is becoming weirder by the day. Debbie Rowe-Jackson...gave up ALL parental rights to BOTH the children, post- birth. Even though she is the biological parent, she hasn't seen her two children from the time she signed away her rights until AFTER MJ's memorial. I have to ask Debbie: "WHY NOW??" LEAVE these children ALONE. They don't know you. They've been raised by Michael, his family and a nanny. Leave them alone, Debbie Rowe or you are going to have one hell of a fight on your hands. A judge will have to decide who raises them based on THEIR needs, not your yo-yo decisions. Are you implying Debbie Rowe that the man you worked for is the biological father?? Maybe THAT explains why...on Larry King Live, Dr. Klein wouldn't commit to a yes, he is or... no he isn't...answer. No one knows WHO "Blanket's" surrogate mother is nor if she was impregnated with MJ's sperm. I don't know that ANY of these speculations are really that relevant as long as they're raised with those they know. What DOES concern me is that SHOULD Debbie get custody of her two biological children, "Blanket" would then be separated from the only brother and sister he's ever known. That would cause MAJOR PSYCHOLOGICAL problems for him and the other two. Debbie Rowe...she reminds me of a woman who carries a child for a couple, signs a consent form that she'll hand over the newborn baby, then, at the last minute, reneges. That is SO unethical. Debbie Rowe...except for YOUR 15 minutes of 'fame', what's in it for you? You can't just appear as their custodial mother when you haven't been around all along.




screen name:

thirteen31 Click for more info ( 3)

posted on 11/07/2009 21:46


comments:

I think this is odd that Michael didn't use his own sperm for his own children, Dark Angel. It seems like the fans here seem to think that Debbie Rowe is to blame, but it takes two...Michael is not so squeaky-clean, either. Stop calling Michael, "Sir" - he was and never will be knighted.




screen name:

shirlmassie Click for more info ( 8)

posted on 11/07/2009 21:10


comments:

Debbie Rowe is an aweful person. She is trying to hurt Sir Michael Jackson's children. These children knew and loved Sir Michael Jackson as their father and he will always be their father. Debbie you've got paid enough. Don't create more havoc, let Sir Michael rest in peace and let those children have the loving future that their father intended for them to have. She doesn't even have any love for the children. I pray that the Lord will remove the evil spirit that is within this creature and her book never to be published. In the mighty name of Jesus this I do pray amen.




screen name:

darkangel Click for more info (2)

posted on 11/07/2009 16:39


comments:

Please, let's not make a racial thing out of this. And, yes it does matter why Michael didn't use his OWN sperm. Doesn't anyone find that a bit odd??




screen name:

darkangel Click for more info ( 2)

posted on 11/07/2009 14:49


comments:

I don't know what the Hell she is. I just want to know one thing. Why didn't they use Michaels sperm?? And, why didn't they have sex to begin with, that is ONE way of having children. I am confused.




screen name:

D.A.SOULJAH Click for more info ( 1)

posted on 10/07/2009 04:52


comments:

FIRST OFF, HOW 'BOUT SHE LOOKS LIKE A FAT WHITE MAN! SECONDLY, MIKE WAS KING OF MUSIC, PERIOD! WOMEN AROUND THE WORLD WERE PASSING OUT AT HIS FEET LIKE HE WAZ THE MESSIAH! WITH ALL OF THE BEAUTIFUL BLACK SISTAZ IN THIS WORLD, AND HE CHOSE THIS FAT WHITE BIOTCH TO BEAR CHILDREN WITH!! AND SHE'S MAKING THESE COMMENTZ LIKE HE WAZ GASSED UP, RUNNING BEHIND HER AZ SHE SPURNED HIS INTERESTZ. WTF!!!! IT HAD TO BE A BUSINESS INDUSTRY PLOY AS PART OF HIS CROSSOVER FROM R&B TO POP, AND HE HAD TO HAVE A GREY GIRL IN HIS CORNER TO MAKE IT LEGIT. . .IF THAT WAS THE CASE, OUT OF TATUM ONEAL, BROOKE SHIELDS, AND THIS COOKIE MONSTER, HE SHOULDVE STAYED WITH BROOKE! AT LEAST SHE'Z HALF WAY FINE;-D SO, YEAH, SHE'Z JUST ANOTHER GOLD DIGG'N CRAKKKA LOOK'N TO SCHEME WHAT SHE CAN FROM BLACK FOLKZ!!!!!!! AINT NO PEACE D.A.SOULJAH




screen name:

WJCBrooker Click for more info ( 1)

posted on 07/07/2009 20:57


comments:

It does not matter whether Prince and Paris are the fruit fo Michael's loins or someone elses sperm donor; as far as the children are concerned he has been their father and dad for the past 12 and 11 years respectively and last week they lost that father - I just wish the press would stop paying idiots like Rowe for their stories as it only encourages them to make up a story to get a few more dollars...




screen name:

Michael Forever <3 Click for more info (2)

posted on 06/07/2009 05:21


comments:

To the person who left the small-minded comment about Michael Jackson, it says more about you than it does about Michael - not everyone in the world is motivated or controlled by sex like you obviously are? As for Debbie Rowe, much of what we've read recently is not actually what she's said, so I think I'll be waiting until there is a formal statement. It also recently occurred to me that she only went for custody when Michael was on trial - could it be she was worried that if he was convicted that the children might not be brought up in the way he wished for them? I could be wrong but I do like to keep an open mind until the truth outs - something which a lot of people could have done when Michael was found NOT GUILTY on ten counts of child molestation and had 140 witnesses speaking in his defense. Debbie Rowe may yet surprise us, after all she did know Michael a bit having been married to him. Perhaps he didn't mention her in the will because of the arrangement that they had previously? I shall be cutting her a little slack until I hear what she has to say. RIP Michael.




screen name:

it is plain to see Click for more info ( 1)

posted on 05/07/2009 18:33


comments:

COME ON PEOPLE!!!wake up people,this man had no interest in women,the whole world could see that..he could not even have sex to make a baby..??what does the freak do!!!!he runs off to a sperm bank with a syringe,,he hated women sexually the same way a gay man has no interest with what is in a girls knickers,,everybody has a sexual interest,his wasn,t women or men but little boys,,,his problem was this;little boys have parents who kept taking away is fortune...the freaks next brain wave was to GROW HIS OWN..GREAT!!no parents to pay off or fight in court,,so he could have is very own victims and keep what if any of his fortune,,DESIRE is a thing all human beings have,,either you desire what is in a womens knickers,,or it scares the hell out of you because your desire is somewhere else,,,remember! god does not sleep,and he will get you when you hold your last breathe...




screen name:

Michael Jackson lover Click for more info ( 1)

posted on 05/07/2009 12:02


comments:

She is such a lieing cow i mean the manis dead shhow some respect. Debbie is such a greddy gold degging cow i hope she does not win the custady Battle and pris and michael II R.I.P Michael Jackson Love you lots xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




screen name:

Tariq Shinedima  Click for more info ( 1)

posted on 30/06/2009 17:52


comments:

She has disappeared after they divorced, she never fought for custody when Michael Jackson was alive. That means she never had any interest in having custody of the kids. now jackson is dead and she is entertaining the media. If jackson was not the father then who is the father? and if the father is nowhere to be found then the kids will be jackson's Intellectual Property (IP). Coz he was the masterminder of their conception. Let the kids decide where they want to be and let her be in her farm taking care of her horses.




screen name:

ABAMAGIRL Click for more info ( 1)

posted on 30/06/2009 17:42


comments:

Anybody with any vision at all would've already known that there is no way that those kids were MJ's biological children. I could not even believe that he told that lie.....




screen name:

Uylanda Jones5 Click for more info ( 1)

posted on 30/06/2009 15:11


comments:

She is like all other female, want nothing but money, she a true bitch. She good women a bad name. They say black women are gold digger, she is a true gold digger.




screen name:

Aluu Click for more info ( 1)

posted on 30/06/2009 13:20


comments:

Is that a joke?!!! Why wait till the guy dies before coming out with the story?!!






add your comments -  back to main article





©2009 Contactmusic.com Ltd, all rights reserved