![]() |
Director : Marcus Nispel
Producer : Mike Medavoy, Arnold Messer, Marcus Nispel
Screenwriter : Laeta Kalogridis
Starring : Karl Urban, Moon Goodblood, Russell Means, Ralf Moeller, Kevin Loring, Jay Tavare, Clancy Brown
The idea that Vikings arrived in America long before Christopher Columbus is a
fascinating one. It's easy to envision these bearded warriors, hunkered down in
their longboats, stumbling sick and exhausted onto North American shores after
a harrowing journey across the wild Atlantic. That's at least what I see. The
makers of Pathfinder see something else entirely. The Vikings who wash ashore
here are giant-sized brutes and they come complete with veritable armies and
practically a herd of horses. It's like they rowed over from Jersey on cruise
ships.
And forget every image of Vikings you've ever seen, these guys are less
Scandinavian herdsman and more post-Apocalypse titans. Remember Humungous from
The Road Warrior ("The Ayatollah of Rock and Rolla!")? Throw a few bear skins
on that guy and give him a helmet made of twelve ram's horns and he could play
every one of the Viking raiders in Pathfinder. I half expected MasterBlaster to
come surging out of the primitive landscape.
The other thing you'll want to forget when viewing Pathfinder is that most
films have a plot. Pathfinder doesn't. It's just a choppy blend of every action
film trope ever written. I suppose that kind of makes it archetypal -- it's not
one thing; it's everything. But the picture's storyline is held together so
flimsily that when you actually get an idea of what's going on, you immediately
realize it's incredibly stupid.
Here's what happens: A Viking boy (who grows up to become Karl Urban) is the
sole survivor of a raiding party gone awry, he's raised as Ghost by the native
peoples his fellow Norsemen have been terrorizing. Fifteen years later, when
the Vikings come back for more pillaging, Ghost is their last and best defense
against the seemingly unstoppable "dragon men" (so named because of their
impenetrable armor). We've got the requisite Dances with Wolves-styled elements
and the obligatory love interest played by Moon Goodblood (if anyone should be
in a Native Americans vs. Vikings movie, it's someone with the name Moon
Goodbloood) but mostly Pathfinder is about slo-mo carnage and widescreen shots
of snowy landscapes.
Director Marcus Nispel (rising from the music video hordes) can't pull a
performance out of anyone in his cast. Urban is as clunky as ever, staring into
nothing to signify deep thoughts and the actual pathfinder, played by Russell
Means, is utterly unconvincing, especially when he's slaying a cave bear
without breaking a sweat. I suppose most of the blame for this colossal mess
belongs to scripter Laeta Kalogridis (Alexander). Not only is Pathfinder
saddled with cheesy Braveheart-riffs ("Run and you may live, fight and you
will…") but everyone also speaks in a grating anachronistic style.
The one highlight of the film (unless you consider gory decapitations a
highlight) is Daniel Pearl's stark cinematography. Pearl's another music video
alumnus and there are certainly many moments when Pathfinder devolves into a
blurry quick-cut mess, but most of the time the film looks stunning. Pearl dabs
the picture in blues and grays and whites and there's something dreamlike,
otherworldly, about the proceedings. In combination with art director Geoff
Wallace and production designer Greg Blair, Pearl creates a primordial
landscape of fetid, dark swamps filled with skulls and towering Wagnerian
mountain peaks. This is the closest anyone's come to capturing the work of
illustrator Frank Frazetta on screen.
Glossy cinematography and design aside, Pathfinder is a jumbled, hysterical
muddle. The characters are not underdeveloped, they're nonexistent, the plot
has so many holes you could drive an entire Panzer division through it and the
acting plain stinks. Like a fever dream, Pathfinder is at times hallucinatory
but ultimately, utterly forgettable.
This path looks really wet.
| Write for us |
21st September 2009 02:32
Agony | ||
![]() |
||
| I agree with all the comments stated here. The movie wasn't bad, very graphic yes. As for looking like other violent action movies, how many ways can you portray hand to hand combat around the year AD1000? Battle themes are bound to be repeated and dramatization in movie making and even real battle sequences tend to repeat themselves in methodology. I do agree that the Norsemen portrayed here seemed rather extreme, but remember movies are a work of art. The artists for this movie use extreme representations to get their point across to show the brutality of the raiders. Picture yourself even now in present day how you would describe a gang of hoodlums that decided to take over your quaint neighborhood. I imagine your description of the men (and women) will be quite overinflated, and the description of your neighborhood will show a quiet loving environment. Last comment I make to contradict your rather humdrum review; from what I could gather, the Dragon men reference was in regards to the prow of their ships ...extended dragon neck and head. Although I digress and admit that is my personal opinion. In conclusion this was not the best movie I have ever seen, but I thought it was worth a watch and already recommended it to others that enjoy historical period dramas. | ||
14th June 2009 15:26
papalegba | ||
![]() |
||
| its easy to criticize, we do it better that anyone else in the world. as far as the size of the Viking longships, its actually quite realistic. three longships would have carried that number of men AND horses quite easily and often did. please check your facts especially when reviewing an historical fiction film. the cinematogrpahy is excellent, and IT IS AN ACTION FILM, RIGHT?! Karl UrbaN IS JUST FINE AS IS Clancy Brown. not to mention Russel Means. Its a good film and its easy to see why the dirctor got the nod for the Conan Film | ||
28th October 2007 12:50
hawkqey | ||
![]() |
||
| If you want to be a reviewer, first of all, get your facts straight. Like failing to see the correct spelling and misspelling of the names of actors. If you have watch the movie, you would have also noticed that it is Moon Bloodgood and not Moon GoodBlood. Pathfinder has its flaws, but overall, i think it's not bad. | ||
" Grim "
Rating: R, 2007
![]() |
Priests - Trailer |
![]() |
Red, Trailer |
![]() |
Star Trek, Brand New Trailer |