Mel Gibson - Comments and Message Board

Letter to Attorney General Dear Madam, Please find the enclosed documents that relate to two family law matter. BF 029484, Miller /Byars and case # YD045322, Hollander / Cullen. The attached complaint to the FBI which has not yet been responded to , as well as the two complaints to the California State Bar. One of which resulted in a recommendation of civil suit the other not yet responded to. Also included is a 2012 letter pertaining to child abuse after which mentioned parties closed their business and what seems to be harassment of the injured parties mentioned in the letter took place. Additionally included are documents which appear to show an attempt by the judiciary to infer that a hate crime was committed. While myself and Mr. Hollander appreciate the litigious nature of family court, we both feel that this matter is injurious to both our children and within the manner that it shows persons of a credentialed nature apparently seem prepared to go outside the parameters of lawful contest displays the way in which they have perpetuated harm upon innocent parties for too many years. We are appealing to you not for intervention on our own behalf, but we believe this type of situation has been manipulated for too many years with in some kind of network or undisclosed acceptance by related parties in a manner as would fill their own pockets. In the year 2013 the harm to society of designed conflict which results in domestic violence, untold and heinous actions as impact innocent children have far out grown their value to society when owns weighs up the overall benefit to perpetrators within their positions in society versus the financial cost to the state and country. Children who tabula rasa, we believe are impacted by what we have described above as could turn them into a danger to society. Parents who are on the receiving end also may be driven to acts that later become understandable within the “doctrine of provocation”. What are the finical costs? Is it possible that a perceptive individual could discern a methodology that would decrease harm to society, decrease the chances of a teenager acting out violently, decrease the chances of an injured adult acting out in a manner that could cause never ending collateral damage across all societal boundaries? Would this design include provisions where by allegations that were not proven up in a certain time, would therefore be dismissed along with any judgment that was based on them. Our belief is this could stream line family law without having to give the directive that an evidentiary standard as is applied in criminal law must be maintained. The conversion of the California Court System to a fully electronic functioning protocol gives an opportunity for those with vision and ethics to protect law and justice the way it is implemented in a unprecedented opportunity that may not be repeated. Respectfully Yours, Graham J. Miller Kenneth A. Hollander

Posted 10 years 2 weeks ago by HOLLANDER

HOLLANDER's picture

Getting divorced/seperated? Odds R you will face false allegations (sexual) Google : FMBK ANTEAU (Hundreds of results) Present the 2-12-12 letter & other documents to Law Enforcement, DCFS Agents, Child Abuse Detectives, School Officials, District Attorneys Office, Judges & the Public PROTECT YOURSELF , LOVED ONES & OTHERS from CHILD ABUSE by DESIGN

Posted 10 years 2 months ago by HOLLANDER

HOLLANDER's picture

California Attorney General acknowledges David J Glass as a "matter of public concern". To all those with morals and to all those who love all children, that this David J. Glass Esq. PhD would giggle

Posted 10 years 2 months ago by HOLLANDER

HOLLANDER's picture

Dear David, Per my recent discussion with a producer at the Dr Phil show the following occurred to me/us. This question was posed after our realization that the first three allegations that ended as unsubstantiated including the first sexual abuse allegation. My discussion with the DA ,Michelle Worden allowed me/us to consider that you as a psychologist who has stated in court this allows you insights, as to the need for empirical evidence ,and further my impression that you have intimidated judges in your manner and on record statements as have caused both wrongfully administered judicial judgments and decisions such as have laid the ground for reversals, reviews and appeals I /we arrived at the following. Did you knowingly aid and abet by written word pleadings, declarations and on the record statements a psychologically dysfunctional client in her actions as would financially benefit yourself, Lori Darakjian and Glass family law? Alternatively are you as a PhD who has repeatedly stated your expertise in this field unable to recognize any signs of dysfunction in your clients as may lead to abuse and harm of children. I have discussed this concept with Mr. G Miller who related to me the following. In 2006 through 2008 it seems in his opinion your employees signed for support checks for your client whose signature appears on said checks yet you signed a declaration to the court stating he was in arrears of more than $9000.00 in spite of bank records showing you and you client had cashed these checks during the time your statements alleged arrears. No arrears were ever ordered by the court and no order or verbiage in any transcript ever appears to validate what appear to be these specious false, libelous perjurious statements in court and on written paper made by yourself. Were you withholding and misleading your client to your own financial ends? I am looking to these and additional other concerns of mine to be answered both in the court of public opinion, court of law and within the expertise of those who provide spiritual guidance within my faith of Judaism. PS. Again can I expect that you and Lori will be joining us on the Dr Phil Show. PSS. David Are you amazed that your prior client is now on her 8th allegation (5/24/12) which alleges I am now stalking her? Best regards, K Hollander

Posted 10 years 3 months ago by HOLLANDER

HOLLANDER's picture

To remind all those with morals and to all those who love all children, that this David J. Glass Esq. PhD would giggle & laugh at me while waiting to see the judge. Shortly after this attached letter dated 2-12-2012 was received by the community of Malibu, CA this David J. Glass Esq. PhD conspired to injure a 3rd party (myself) , suborned perjury and falsified evidence just before he closed down his practice and went to FMBK Law.The CA State Bar has just received a 2nd complaint regarding this matter. 2-12-12 Mr. Graham J Miller REGARDING CHILD ABUSE To The Principals of Malibu Elementary Schools and To Whom it may concern within the LAUSD and SMMUSD administrations, Directors or other persons. Dear Sir Madam or MS, I am writing to you firstly as a parent. I have a child in a Malibu public school. I am also writing as a Citizen, and therefore concerned in a more global manner with issues that I personally find disturbing and relevant. I believe a possible failure to perform to ethical codes of several professions, let alone what any normal person may find to be reasonable is about to, and could in the future lead to embarrassment, public consternation and at best a complete lack of faith ,trust and confidence in the above agencies. I have recently been informed by my daughter Lily-Jane Faith Miller that her mother has taken her out of Callahan elementary (Northridge); and she is now at some school in Malibu district. (Grade 2) My reasons for my concern follow. Within the Malibu school district there is a teacher, (C Cullen) who has accused her ex-husband of two counts of sexual abuse of their son, and 5 other counts of abuse of their son (11). This alleged abuse according to Ms. Cullen and her Attorney took place over the past 5 years. I would like a notation in my daughter’s file that she is never to be placed in class with the above person as her “(my daughters)” teacher. I apologize in in that I amenable to provide more details on my daughter’s whereabouts (school) but her Mom has not provided that info. I’m sure Dr Jacob the principal at Callahan would be able to assist. In MS Cullen’s divorce and custody case she utilized the services of a Mr. D Glass Esq.(Attorney) Mr Glass is also a PhD in Psychology .Mr. Glass was also utilized by the mother of my daughter, Lily -Jane in my own divorce and custody matter. Mr. Glass a Psychologist/ Attorney and mandated reporter saw fit to bring allegations of sexual abuse of a child and 4 allegations of other forms of abuse of MS Cullen’s son Sammy before family court. These all were investigated by the Police DCFS, and the District Attorney. They were found to be without either Medical or Credentialed 3rd party verification and closed therefore as unsubstantiated. These allegations were brought by MS Cullen via the services of Mr. Glass and occurred regularly before the summer school break on a yearly basis. MS Cullen had also recently remarried a Mr Brian Winsick another Teacher and coach in the Conejo Valley. Their marriage took place just prior to the allegations beginning. I will now outline my concerns and reasons for the request of the notation in my daughters file. It is my belief that the relationship between this teacher Ms. Cullen and her attorney and my own ex-wife and the same attorney is cause for reasonable concern. That to avoid any unfortunate incident where god forbid I was to be accused by my daughter’s mother of something similar as MS Cullen accused her ex-husband of it is imperative no establish able link is in place as could lead to suspicion of collusion. The worst case scenario that Ms. Cullen at some time becomes my daughters teacher and subsequently claims are made that perhaps my daughter had inferred to MS Cullen that I had abused her ( Lily-Jane) and MS Cullen then could relate this to my daughters mother through their mutual attorney, or contact at school is beyond horrific. I feel the separation of my daughter and this teacher protects LAUSD/SMMUSD and my daughter and me. In a more global sense I am concerned that a teacher married to another teacher and coach and an attorney who is also licensed as a psychologist made no attempt to make aware the LAUSD or the SMUSD of their concerns. (Two allegations of Sexual abuse and five other allegations of abuse.) Surely some ethical codes of their respective professions would demand other relevant or parties who could be impacted be advised. When a teacher finds the resources to pay $500 an hour to a Beverly Hills Attorney for 5 years surely there is a need for verification that such allegations will bring in terms of the expenses the County and State will bear during the protracted conflict. Especially if the accused has been made indigent by the continued claims and has suffered stress or work issues stemming from such accusations and is no longer paying taxes. As a parent I certainly would be outraged if I knew my child’s teacher was aware of a legitimate abuse situation and if, as in this case it included Sexual Abuse allegations and that teacher did nothing to bring attention to it as could protect other children I would expect answers. Specifically why and how a person(s) (2 Teachers, (Coach), An Attorney/Psychologist) would go ahead and consciously disregard accusations of such a serious nature, and then they having brought these allegations before family court and the district attorney go ahead and let other parents arrange activities with the person they were accusing of abuse in a manner as would expose other children to the accused. What is more disturbing and I expect the press will find disturbing is that repeated allegations of this nature are often utilized in family conflicts and that this is acceptable is in fact a failure of morality within our society. I believe this failure may have had a profound societal impact. That the failure of an application of evidentiary standards as are normally applied in criminal matters may have allowed credentialed persons possibly with questionable motive to use family court in a manipulative and deceitful way to achieve their own ends appears to me to be worthy of consideration. This epidemic of claims of abuse of children caught in such situations, (family breakups) versus children, who suffer actual abuse , desensitizes the general public and governmental agencies and allows real and dangerous criminals to hide and operate with virtual impunity in our society. It is beyond Peter and the Wolf it is an ongoing crime against humanity. To falsely perpetrate something that I believe leads to what we are now facing in the LAUSD and SMMUSD and may have exacerbated, perpetuated and indeed by lack of action condoned events and actions that possibly has led to emotional; mental and even physical harm to any child is heinous. I believe because of the actions as I have described many prior red flags have been ignored in many abuse situations and much suffering and harm and expense could have been avoided if a less commonplace attitude of children was the norm. Indeed in the immediate situation with (C Cullen, B Winsick )either the allegations were scurrilous and a product of vitriol, and an attorney(PhD Psych) with who knows what motivation (7 Claims) and that these claims were worthy of public expense .Or these persons were aware the claims they were bringing were false and therefore not worthy of reporting to LAUISD/SMUSD or other parents.? The alternative is an admission of negligent lack of reasonable due diligence and surely a great lack of concern for the school both pupils and other teachers and parents has been flagrantly displayed in total disregard for the safety and welfare of minors. Whether this is or should be a concern for the bond holders of these persons I do not know. Mr. Glass, Glass family Law and former associate of (Kolodny & Anteau) One of the most respected family law firms in the United States (Mel Gibson Getty, etc.) has been investigated by the CA Bar already in this matter and while the complaint was not upheld a letter suggesting the possibility of civil redress was issued by them. The APA also found he did no wrong apparently within their own ethics code. The fact remains an Attorney/Psychologist and a Teacher and a Teacher/Coach surely have some duty to the community. The positions of trust and respect they are afforded should allow the general public a reasonableness within their expectation of propriety and protection of the innocent by such credentialed persons. Perhaps the LAUSD/SMUSD could incorporate or suggest to the CA Bar a cooperative relationship of a professional nature that would allow this protection to be afforded our children as well as draft a code for the LAUSD/SMUSD’s own employees in such situations. Certainly recent events could lead one to surmise that a better clarified way of maintaining the safety and welfare of our children, from both bonifide and false claims of abuse would be helpful. The harm that both real and imagined events can bring to families, as well as collateral persons and an institution such as children’s learning environment should be minimalized at all times. Sincerely Yours, Graham J Miller. 885 Avenue of the Americas Penthouse 1A New York. NY. 10001

Posted 10 years 3 months ago by HOLLANDER

HOLLANDER's picture

Dear Mr. Gibson, It is more than my opinion that you have not told the Jews enough about what they need to do in yours and the rest of the world's case. I speak for this entire planet when I say that you are correct in what you have said about them, and that it would be more than propper to tell them again why they should dive head first off the face of this earth for the sake of mankind. I thank you for having the plums to have told those ungodly bastards what they should hear everyday for the rest of eternity, and then some. I wish you a great and fine life sir, and I would back you in every way in this or any other issue. See you in The Movies. J.M.

Posted 13 years 2 weeks ago by James Monet

James Monet's picture

melis me alma leticia the girl fantasticwhat pretty photos have you!

Posted 14 years 5 months ago by alma leticia sa...

alma leticia san martìn's picture

I love you actor melgibsonagain you want with my heart nowand you?

Posted 14 years 8 months ago by alma leticia pè...

alma leticia pèrez san martìn's picture

mel is not just an actor who gets paid for a movie... no, to me he presents new challenges in hollywood where he always has a different approach to acting, producing and directing...he has a huge reserve of issues to be addressed through the movie industry. Mel is an icon. Mel absorbes you in whatever he's doing! Amazingly, you can not avoid watching a movie of his even if you have watched it hundreds of times... I believe that as humans everyone makes mistakes so please if you blame him for certain actions stop! I believe in his political views -although many do not. At lease the man is honest to speak up when he should. Mel has a side that not many know about, so don't be judgmental, he's human.Mel's movies are great, his way of thinking is FREE, and his way of addressing issues is extremely interesting.From my heart, I wish he works on a movie that talks about the middle east Subjectively.

Posted 15 years 1 month ago by dimo

dimo's picture

dear mr. gibson i would like to see you do a movie on the book of revelations i know it will wake up a lot of people and i mean the ones in washington.

Posted 15 years 3 months ago by kitty kat

kitty kat's picture

I have an idea for a film that I am sure would attract an audience. Mel has done a lot of great work involving a fight of struggle against England. What about writing a script about the political and military overthrow of the English government in Northern Ireland. That would be a totally awesome movie especially because it involves the current issues. Give me credit for this one Mel.

Posted 15 years 8 months ago by One Country

One Country's picture

Mel I have an idea for a Movie you could make thatmight help end the Senseless killing in iraq,and put an end to the war. Make a Movie that would be focused on those Crazy Suicide Bombers and show them where they are really going, after they kill all those innocent Men Women and Children. Make it a Hell that will Terrify them into a fear of what will happen to them after Death. I know you can make this type of Movie Best Regards: Bernie Brisson

Posted 17 years 1 month ago by Bernieandernie

Bernieandernie's picture

I have just finished watching with interest an interview with Richard Wilkins on Channel 9 in Australia. Even as Mel noted the "incident" took place over 6 months ago, when crossing back to the studio the anchorperson couldn't help but try to build up the racism issue again. Full credit to Richard Wilkins for trying to shut that type of sensationalism down and congrats for your new film. And I am sure you will have every success with anything that you put your mind to!!! And dont let journalists or any other tall poppy syndrome bring you back down!!!

Posted 17 years 2 months ago by grumpymum

grumpymum's picture

Mel is a good guy. Knock it off. He is an Icon in my eyes and I will believe what ever he says.barbara

Posted 17 years 6 months ago by peace0000

peace0000's picture

hey Britta: thanks for your reply to 'FASCIST HOLLYWOOD' and...hey don't worry it's o.k. to have an opinion even if it's based upon failure due to a narrow minded perspective in ones god--envy& greed--which is most often derived from ones lack of success and being morally bankrupt. but hey, that's cool...that's cool man. i was trying to do you a favor but...hey...miss it if you like. you can also continue to miss your objective in your small world of, oh ' look at me i'm so cool.. rebel without a cause bra'...boring...already been done...' routine. in addition, your so cool, curt ideology response of... 'don't show me the whole picture...so i can get..' well, makes you more like fascist corp. than you realize. (and probably a lack of writing skills and laziness) hey bra, i have an idea, maybe it's appropriate for you to change your name to 'rude corp.' what-a-ya think there mate? i think it's a more honest an awesome name for-ya. your ideology fits smoothing-ly well with it...don't-cha think there sport? (and your not fooling anybody, everybody knows that the first thing you did was check out the website unfame.com)...laughable man. good luck with that, i'll see you at the bottom with the misinformed. peace out, question everything, TheGoodRasputin

Posted 17 years 7 months ago by Brook Brooks

Brook Brooks's picture

I like Mel Gibson now, because he's anti-semitic and sexist. .

Posted 17 years 7 months ago by my two cents

my two cents's picture

FASCIST HOLLYWOOD gillian anderson 'Joan Of Hollywood' Reveals...(unFAME):..'.her sacrifice was the vehicle required to significantly help expose indicators of corp's current fascist ways in monopolizing the arts. Gillian Anderson's career is this article's catalyst.It's a cruel and tearful tale. It's also documented and therefore pinnacle. More and more Hollywood actors are showing outward signs of this.'HOLLYWOOD ACTORS: SUFFER IN VEIL OF SILENCE...It seems that the people's concern for the survival of the arts has become passe. Also, the younger generation has apparently bought into the celeb biz b.s., like people did in the 30's and 40's. Working as an actor|artist in Hollywood can be a brutal and treacherous endeavor. Corp. Hollywood's powerful monopolizing stance in the commercialism of the 'Arts and Entertainment Corp. Hollywood Celeb. Industry' is dismantling the arts. It is abusing our actors and controlling the people in order to fill it's pockets with cash and at the extinction of our society's freedom of speech. Of course, the seasoned Hollywood actors are tortuously aware that the glitz and seeming glamour of it (celeb biz), is just the lavish icing on top of this inedible cake. In fact, this icing is the main way that Corporate hides the fact that most that work in the arts in Hollywood are part of an extremely oppressed group of talented and gifted artists suffering in silence in order to keep their job offers coming in. The 'red carpet, arts and entertainment corp. celeb industry' is owned and harshly managed by giant corporations specializing in marketing and commercialism (not the arts). The 'corp. celeb biz' spoils, generated in business and services, advertising, merchandise and endorsements, tax breaks, profit sharing and portfolio interest payouts, etc. via this fake cake, would surely have to be measured in the billions.'SCARE & SLANDER' AND 'BLACK-BALL' TACTICS..Every savvy person involved in the arts, being commercially managed by corp. Hollywood, is fully aware of the sharp blade that Corporate wields with a swift and heavy hand. I'm speaking of their 'scare & slander' and 'black-ball' management tactics. The old-money actor families that survived Hollywood, as far back as the 1930's to 40's, know that this isn't new. In addition, corp's questionable, extremely oppressive and borderline unlawful labor practices, sweat-shop type working conditions, and yes, skewed compensation (relative to how enormously non-affordable it is to be a famous actor), are kept under tight wraps as well. More and more Hollywood actors are showing outward signs of this. Even so-called "independent film" is in many cases affected by commercialism. Corp. Hollywood's monopoly of the arts is in serious violation of America's freedom of speech. 'JOAN OF HOLLYWOOD',(AWESOME MATRIARCH OF THE ARTS)..Gillian Anderson is known for being beloved, sometimes quirky and rambunctious. Also, she has most honorably and courageously earned an ever growing title, 'Joan Of Hollywood.' (Insider buzz: there are even songs being written for consideration about this theme.) Her past career situation in Hollywood is a perfect, documented, iconic example of the horrific professional, personal and thankless sacrifices that she and her peers too often have to endure in Hollywood. She's been quite humble in not glorifying it. And in true form of most artists with kindred spirits, she has not retaliated. However, her unfortunate situation was the necessary magnifier needed to isolate the indicators of big corporations' meticulous and methodical (marketing-disguised) coup and questionable (some might say cruel) business practices, perpetrated by their appointed money-hungry department heads, their aligned subsidiaries and their silent allied conglomerate partners. This promising actor was robbed, while under contract, of young motherhood with her only small child. She was forced to work 17hr days, five and a half work day weeks for a straight decade. Of course this helped corp. cut their costs in doing business. They could have hired more people and invested more into their production budget in order to provide fair and humane work scenarios for their employees. Ms. Anderson's history is testimony to her convictions and activism concerning the too often taxing and established ways of the great. It's these same personal certitudes that dictate her integrity as being totally awesome. As a young working mom, she said no more and resigned for the sake of her small child and at great risk to her career. That's the coolest thing ever. Expectantly and immediately, the 'scare & slander' and 'black-ball' tactics began against her. Corp's unspoken policy, as most can easily imagine, is that nobody quits them. Nobody. They quit you! She was never considered for any notable big name projects worthy of her hard earned decade of accomplishments thereafter.Gillian Anderson's well earned reputation as a talented actor with a diligent work ethic began to immediately tarnish upon tendering her resignation. We all have seen this pattern happen over and over again to our actors that are on the outs with corp. The (cleverly difficult to prove) corp. 'celeb biz' sponsored gossip columns, which attack ones character via skewed truths and innuendo, is a diseased bat which preys in the darkest of hours. It's too easy to leak any rumor, factual or not, in any format, intensity, whenever and to whomever. And it's common knowledge that corp. Hollywood is the media. Therefore it's not difficult to visualize a corp. dept. head cowering behind the phone calls and fax-emails of their subsidiaries and their silent 'partners in greed' in this. The 'scare and slander' tactic is a vampire with a velvet touch. As many of her peers before her, that have said no to corp. Hollywood, Gillian Anderson has slipped into relative obscurity. Like many, she understandably, has since left our U.S. and moved to the UK. Gillian Anderson is one more Hollywood artist whose promising career, home and family, and personal life, has been unfairly damaged via corporate. Some Americans take objections to having the people's arts and our artists exploited for the sole purpose of greed, engorging the accounts of billion-dollar, monopolizing corporate heads and corporations. Our society seriously needs our promising artists. Not one is unimportant. Not one, especially young working mothers with small children. This is the U.S. isn't it?...or is it? God help the artist that makes the mistake of Rembrandt Von Ryan (see art history, 1600's Amsterdam) when applying for a job with corp. Hollywood; then stumbles, falls, and finds themselves unable to feed the parking meter if they don't have another kindred spirit to help lift them up. "ACTORS ONLY GOOD AS LAST FILM"--NOT...A more accurate statement might read: An actor is only as free, protected, and financially independent as:(see unfame.com) APATHY?...FASCISM?...ARTS' & SOCIETY'S FUTURE?..History offers us friendly advice and warning. What sets the U.S. apart from WWII Germany and fascist states to include those currently in the Middle East? Is it differences in the way we conduct local and global commerce or differences in our military generals? Supposedly it's having our arts established as the spearhead in freedom of speech and freedom from oppression. How the arts are managed and filtered into society will always define that state as free or oppressed. And when any entity other than the people begins managing the media, especially the arts, alarm bells should be going off! The leader of WWII Germany was a failed artist but an expert in the history and philosophy of art and it's power. Most are aware that they utilized film and media as their primary vehicle to manipulate an entire society. Was the people's early pervasive apathy towards society's arts responsible for the events that followed? The debate continues today. Should the people not take timely responsibility as the majority overseers of our society's arts and employ our supreme courts to free the arts...well, history has a tendency to repeat itself, doesn't it? I'm not saying that corp. Hollywood's intent is anti-semitic. But they have proven that they will, indeed, break down anyone that questions their power or greed. Fascist states suck. Their great manipulate the people by strangling society's arts with an iron hand in order to obtain their own personal, individual and political agendas. Most left and right wing voters would agree that fascism even if enabled with a velvet touch is just as dangerous and oppressive to the people. unFAME understands as most do that free commercial business and trade helps keep America a global power. It's also understood that a free state's arts belong to the people and the great. However, the majority vote belongs to the people and it's the people who are the faithful overseers of the arts which guide our civilization. ***(The Future Of Hollywood Arts?)In hypothetical pondering, what is our society's inevitable future should big corporations in Hollywood continue to go unchallenged? Most likely we can say goodbye to the 'For Whom The Bell Tolls' and say hello to the 'Paris Hiltons' as mascots depicting U.S. arts.In this we could find ourselves under a chronic 'celeb biz' anesthetic thereby evolving into a people who are unconsciously oppressed. Therein, if that's not bad enough, we could apathetically lose our consciousness for endeavoring towards universal understanding. Advancement in humanity and higher civilization depend upon how well we manage the arts. They guide our society. Wake up! Stand up! are leading lyrics used in songs coming out of Hollywood studios. For those of us affluent enough to take action it might be wise to take these words more to heart. It's wholesome to permit the arts and corp. to be at matched odds with one another. However, monopolizing our arts or retaining fascist like ways to choke them is not favorable for maintaining strong stability within our people or establishing a well respected status as an allied global power. FAMOUS ACTORS NEED EMPATHY TOO...Famous actors|artists in Hollywood don't live on a different planet. And they don't need our envy or worship. They're America's symbols of royalty depicting freedom from oppression as they pursue universal enlightenment in the humanities via their craft. Currently, they are fiercely oppressed by a mammoth opponent. Famous actors are gifts to our civilization and deserve our enthusiastic respect, empathy and supremely active support. Corp. is what it is. An actor or anyone in any other career field may implore massive conglomerate corporations to reform their ideologies. But who can suggest anything to these giants? Even the great don't have the resources to buy justice in a court battle with Corp. Hollywood. However, the people's response to corp's marketing ploys can trigger reform in high places. So, to those who have been understandably mislead, know that actors have to contend with 'The Man' in all aspects same as you and probably more so. Corp's campaign to control the arts would have to depend on that component of mankind which is unsympathetic to those appearing to live a lush lifestyle. Keep in mind, corp. is responsible for creating and perpetuating the 'rich icing ' upon the 'fake cake' of celebrity-ism. Don't believe it. In addition corp. doesn't publicly say much. They are abnormally quiet as a mouse except for silently investing in their highly publicized 'red carpet' events. The following can be deemed an accurate definition of most famous actors today. They are gifted artists forced into the stock market and investment business who work as actors to help supplement their income. Have you ever heard the statement, "I'm working as a waiter to be an actor?", which is impossible by the way. It's too exhausting and distracting from the creative environment which an artist must have least their muse and soul wilt. Some of our society's greatest actors have quit, never to return because: it's impossible to be a corporate artist (no such thing); the arts have been taken over by oppressive businessmen, 'corporate-land'; it's current economic opportunities can't support the enormous costs necessary for famous actors to live a safe, peaceful and private family lifestyle, while residing in a small, somewhat isolated city with little economic diversity located in a desert (L.A.) infested by gangs, paparazzi, and crazed celeb-biz fans. Where's the glamour, man? I mentioned actors deserve empathy too. Do you honestly think that 'The Man' would be so generous as to pay any of us more than just enough to get by with a little bit left over for savings while we swim in credit card interest payments? Dude, "all things being relative" doesn't stop at a famous actor's numeric bank balance. Just because their cage has more gold than us common folk who work for 'The Mister', well, it's still a cage. In addition just because actors are contracted to participate in undermining their own free artistic selves with the 'red carpet and talk-show, horse and pony act,' doesn't mean that they are the coveted wealthy tycoons which corp. would like you to believe. If one listens closely the actors are telling you different....TO BE CONTINUED...CLOSING STATEMENT Regarding our arts, and quoting the music group Modest Mouse "this building is totally burning down!" This affects us all, man. "The biggest fool is one who has all the facts but doesn't know what they mean." The information contained in this article is published common knowledge within the Hollywood arena. unFAME has merely connected the dots to this illusive corp. 'celeb biz' verses the arts puzzle revealing a clearer picture for the people outside that small circle.and there's more...unfame.com, [email protected]

Posted 17 years 7 months ago by Brook Brooks

Brook Brooks's picture

Wow!!!I have always admired Mel.I am so sad though to know that he's another one with the drinking and driving issue. Not only putting himself in danger, but his children, and other families as well. I'm so glad that he did not endagered anybody else or himself and that he was caught by an officer so that he can FIX and END this problem before is too late. I hope he reads these comments from fans that admire his talents, his wonderful, beautiful, great work. We want the best for him and he seriuosly needs to do something about this drinking & driving ASAP. ***You know Mr.Gibbson the next time you want to drink, go ahead drink all you want but call somebody to drive you back home safely. We want to see lots more of your cool work. We want to read positive news about you not the bad stuff. We have already to much of that going on everywhere. God blees you always.Oh yeah! You're still admired.

Posted 17 years 7 months ago by jungerdenju

jungerdenju's picture

wow!!. I always thought that Mel Gibson was a pure Australian. But it seems he wasn't born in Australia after all. I hope it was him who adopted himself as an aussie rather than Australia once again adopting actors who were born overseas, but if they travelled to Australia once they become Australian. MEH.But who really cares because he's a kickarse actor. :)

Posted 18 years 1 week ago by WOW!!

WOW!!'s picture

If Mell Gibson does a film on Revelation prophecy, I hope he includes the SUDDED DEATH of Children Prophecy foretold in the book of Revelation. All SIDS infants are a select few infants that are blood type A. And it is most common there is a parent that is also blood type A that has two consecutive dreams like Joseph did in the old testament and/or Visions (turning stiff like dead, in infants called high risk for sudden infant death syndrom)like the Revelation prophet John. There is a microbiologist in israel that thinks he has found the (y) chromozone to the tribe of Levi. There infants were to be dedicated to GOD ect... in the Old Testament. This was the tribe chosen to minister forever and to now assist the high priest known today as Jesus Christ. The chromozone for male is (y) while the female is (xy). The book of ACTS tells that in the last days both men and woman will prophecy. The Revelation pass over is on. For more on this please search AIDS SIDS LEVI for "Making the AIDS SIDS Tribe of Levi Connection".

Posted 18 years 4 months ago by Rahab

Rahab's picture

Mel Gibson

Mel Gibson Quick Links

News Pictures Video Film Music Quotes RSS
Advertisement
Advertisement
Artists
Actors
    Filmmakers
      Artists
      Bands
        Musicians
          Artists
          Celebrities
             
              Artists
              Interviews