| View comments (2) | Comment on this artist |
Damien Hirst was born in 1965, in Bristol. From 1986 to 1989 he studied a fine art degree at Goldsmith's College, University of London. He said he chose this course as it was not specifically based to just painting, or just sculpture. It was general and this was what he was looking for.
10th February 2012
Daniel Radcliffe was once left flustered by a fan who wanted to shake his hand while he was....
3rd November 2011
Red Hot Chili Peppers star Flea has teamed up with revered artist Damien Hirst to release a....
12th September 2011
Artist Damien Hirst's tribute video of U2's 1992 hit Even Better Than The Real Thing has inspired....
7th September 2011
Ronnie Wood has credited Damien Hirst with helping him win his booze battle, after the British....
7th September 2011
Ronnie Wood has revealed he was once kidnapped by Damien Hirst and taken to rehab. The....
I'm not sure if there's much of a 'legend' around Leigh Bowery, but for the uninitiated (and I figure ....

More Damien Hirst Film / Movie Reviews
These are the best links to Damien Hirst Sites on the web:
1st December 2009 15:27
bluebottle | ||
![]() |
||
| Come on Mark, It was first put up for sale at $3M. In any case, well done. j | ||
8th June 2007 12:05
Mark Datter | ||
![]() |
||
| THE ASTRONOMICAL NEW HISTORY OF ART Following Damien Hirst’s £50 million “For the love of God”, I have decided to put my painting “The eternal and infinite universe (94)” on the market for £50 million and one pence. This work, painted in 1994, November, carried a brief explanation of the universe as eternal and infinite, reasoning that the visible universe should be accelerating apart (in a way that also explained the ‘ clumping of matter’ phenomenon). It also provided an explanation for Olbers paradox, in an infinite universe, in terms of basic physics. The painting was publicly exhibited first in Jan 1995 with a price of £7 million. Gathering observations of supernovae about two-to-three years later showed the universe was accelerating apart (against all the expectations of astrophysicists) affirming the theory in the painting. Naturally, if the universe is infinite and eternal (something we can never know for sure) then everything is ultimately unfathomable. Maybe that is why the universe becomes more understandable ultimately to an artist than to scientists. The new price reflects the painting’s (not yet widely known) unique achievement in the history of art and the history of understanding the universe: two histories that should converge, as they do in this work. Mark Bridger | ||